A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ultrasonographic evaluation of ureteral stones in children: can we use stone width as a predictor of spontaneous passage? | LitMetric

Aims: We aimed to obtain the maximum transverse diameters (widths) of ultrasonographically detectable ureteral stones in children and to evaluate the effect of widths on the rate of spontaneous discharge and on the degree of ipsilateral hydronephrosis.

Material And Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 52 ultrasonographically detected ureteral stones in 51 consecutive patients (32 males, 19 females) with a median age of 9 years (range, 6 months-17 years).

Results: In group 1, in which the stones passed spontaneously (n=29), sonographically measured median and mean widths of ureteral stones were 3.8 mm (range, 2.3-7.3 mm) and 4.1+/-1.3 mm, respectively. In group 2, in which the stones required surgical procedures (n=23), median and mean widths were 5.9 mm (range, 3.9-10.0 mm) and 5.9+/-1.8 mm, respectively. The difference between widths in group 1 and group 2 was significant (p=0.001). With regard to the whole study group (n=52), the majority of the stones below 4.0 mm (88.9%, n=16/18) were passed spontaneously and 2/3 of the stones above 5.0 mm required intervention (66.7%, n=12/18). The width range of 4.0-5.0 mm can be accepted as "range of transition" for spontaneous passage and surgical procedures. The stone width was different in patients with mild and severe pelvicaliectasis (p=0.0001).

Conclusions: In children, measuring the width of an ultrasonographically detectable ureteral stone can be useful for assessing its possibility to be passed spontaneously. Pelvicaliectasis should be an alerting sign for the presence of an occult ipsilateral ureteral stone in a symptomatic patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11152/mu.201.3.2066.164.uya1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ureteral stones
16
passed spontaneously
12
stones
8
stones children
8
stone width
8
ultrasonographically detectable
8
detectable ureteral
8
group stones
8
median widths
8
stones required
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!