Is mechanical dyssynchrony a therapeutic target in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?

Background: Previous studies have found a high frequency of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), hence suggesting that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be considered in HFpEF. The present study was designed to compare the amount of mechanical dyssynchrony between HFpEF patients and (1) HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) patients with an indication for CRT (HFrEF-CRT(+)) group, (2) HFrEF patients with QRS duration < 120 ms (HFrEF-QRS < 120 ms) group, and (3) hypertensive controls (HTN).

Methods: Electrical (ECG) and mechanical dyssynchrony (atrio-ventricular dyssynchrony, interventricular dyssynchrony, intraventricular dyssynchrony) were assessed using conventional, tissue Doppler, and Speckle Tracking strain echocardiography in 40 HFpEF patients, 40 age- and sex-matched HTN controls, 40 HFrEF-QRS < 120 ms patients, and 40 HFrEF-CRT(+) patients.

Results: The frequency of left bundle branch block was low in HFpEF patients (5%) and similar to HTN controls (5%, P = 0.85). Indices of dyssynchrony were similar between HFpEF and HTN patients or HFrEF-QRS < 120 ms patients. In contrast, most indices of dyssynchrony differed between HFpEF and HFrEF-CRT(+) patients. The principal components analysis on the entire cohort of 160 patients yielded 2 homogeneous groups of patients in terms of dyssynchrony, the first comprising HFrEF-CRT(+) patients and the second comprising HTN, HFrEF-QRS < 120 ms and HFpEF patients.

Conclusions: Mechanical dyssynchrony in HFpEF does not differ from that of patients with HTN or patients with HFrEF and a narrow QRS. This data raises concerns regarding the role of dyssynchrony in the pathophysiology of HFpEF and thereby the potential usage of CRT in HFpEF.