Differences in muscle activity between natural forefoot and rearfoot strikers during running.

J Biomech

Departments of Mechanical Engineering, USA; Bioengineering, Stanford University, USA. Electronic address:

Published: November 2014

Running research has focused on reducing injuries by changing running technique. One proposed method is to change from rearfoot striking (RFS) to forefoot striking (FFS) because FFS is thought to be a more natural running pattern that may reduce loading and injury risk. Muscle activity affects loading and influences running patterns; however, the differences in muscle activity between natural FFS runners and natural RFS runners are unknown. The purpose of this study was to measure muscle activity in natural FFS runners and natural RFS runners. We tested the hypotheses that tibialis anterior activity would be significantly lower while activity of the plantarflexors would be significantly greater in FFS runners, compared to RFS runners, during late swing phase and early stance phase. Gait kinematics, ground reaction forces and electromyographic patterns of ten muscles were collected from twelve natural RFS runners and ten natural FFS runners. The root mean square (RMS) of each muscle׳s activity was calculated during terminal swing phase and early stance phase. We found significantly lower RMS activity in the tibialis anterior in FFS runners during terminal swing phase, compared to RFS runners. In contrast, the medial and lateral gastrocnemius showed significantly greater RMS activity in terminal swing phase in FFS runners. No significant differences were found during early stance phase for the tibialis anterior or the plantarflexors. Recognizing the differences in muscle activity between FFS and RFS runners is an important step toward understanding how foot strike patterns may contribute to different types of injury.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301610PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ffs runners
24
rfs runners
24
muscle activity
20
swing phase
16
differences muscle
12
activity natural
12
natural ffs
12
runners
12
natural rfs
12
tibialis anterior
12

Similar Publications

Effects of habitual foot strike patterns on patellofemoral joint and Achilles tendon loading in recreational runner.

Gait Posture

December 2024

Key Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, China. Electronic address:

Background: Most running biomechanics studies have focused on either the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) or Achilles tendon (AT) alone, generating fragmented understanding of how these structures interact as components of an integrated kinetic chain during running. This study was to investigate concurrent biomechanical changes in the PFJ and AT in recreational runners.

Methods: The recreational runners who are accustomed to run with rearfoot strike (RFS, n = 15) and forefoot strike (FFS, n = 15) patterns were recruited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study examines how marathon running impacts lumbar spine health, focusing on injuries and disc degeneration.
  • It compares 54 amateur marathon runners to 30 healthy participants using advanced imaging techniques to assess fat fraction, cross-sectional area of muscles, and T2 relaxation times of intervertebral discs.
  • Results indicate that marathon runners had notable differences in fat fraction and muscle cross-sectional area, suggesting changes in lumbar spine and surrounding tissues related to their running activities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Foot strike patterns during running are typically categorized into two types: non-rearfoot strike (NRFS) and rearfoot strike (RFS), or as three distinct types: forefoot strike (FFS), midfoot strike (MFS), and RFS, based on which part of the foot lands first. Various methods, including two-dimensional (2D) visual-based methods and three-dimensional (3D) motion capture-based methods utilizing parameters such as the strike index (SI) or strike angle (SA), have been employed to assess these patterns. However, the consistency between the results obtained from each method remains debatable.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: This study aimed to explore the impact of different landing methods on leg movement ability and the relationship between various parameters of leg movement. : This work parameters including stride, contact time, flight time, duty factor, stride angle, vertical stiffness, leg stiffness and peak vertical ground reaction force. Thirty healthy subjects voluntarily participated in this study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cues to land softly and quietly result in acute reductions in ground reaction force loading rates in runners.

Gait Posture

March 2024

Spaulding National Running Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.

Background: A common gait retraining goal for runners is reducing vertical ground reaction force (GRF) loading rates (LRs), which have been associated with injury. Many gait retraining programs prioritize an internal focus of attention, despite evidence supporting an external focus of attention when a specific outcome is desired (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!