Effectiveness of balloon sinuplasty in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis.

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol

Centro de Otorrinolaringologia de São Paulo, Complexo Hospitalar Edmundo Vasconcelos, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Published: March 2015

Introduction: Balloon sinuplasty is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure, developed with the aim of restoring patency of the paranasal sinuses ostia with minimal damage to the mucosa.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of balloon sinuplasty in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study comprising 18 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without polyposis who underwent balloon sinuplasty. Patients were evaluated for clinical criteria, quality of life (Sino-Nasal Outcome Questionnaire Test-20 [SNOT-20]), and computed tomography of the sinuses (Lund-Mackay staging) preoperatively and three to six months after the procedure.

Results: Out of 18 patients assessed, 13 were included, with a mean age of 39.9±15.6 years. Ostia sinuplasty was performed in 24 ostia (four sphenoid, ten frontal, and ten maxillary sinus). At the follow-up, 22 (92%) ostia were patent and there was no major complication. There was symptomatic improvement (SNOT-20), with Cronbach coefficients for consistency of the questionnaire items of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.73-0.94) preoperatively and of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95) postoperatively, the difference being statistically significant (p<0.001). In addition, there was marked reduction of the computed tomography signs, an average of 4.2 point score (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Sinuplasty is effective in reducing symptoms and improving quality of life as a treatment option for chronic rhinosinusitis in selected patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442691PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.08.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

balloon sinuplasty
16
sinuplasty patients
12
patients chronic
12
effectiveness balloon
8
chronic rhinosinusitis
8
rhinosinusitis polyposis
8
sinuplasty
5
patients
5
polyposis introduction
4
introduction balloon
4

Similar Publications

Short- and long-term costs of sinus balloon sinuplasty and middle meatal antrostomy.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

December 2024

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 272, FI-33101, Tampere, Finland.

Purpose: To evaluate and compare hospital related costs, postoperative costs, and the long-term costs of maxillary balloon sinuplasty (BSP) and middle meatal antrostomy (MMA) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Methods: Data were collected from patient registers on 88 patients treated with BSP and 240 patients treated with MMA between 2011 and 2017. Information was also gathered on the related costs of surgery, material, postoperative ward care, and any extra patient visits that took place within one year following the operation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The review focuses on the current evidence surrounding balloon sinuplasty for treating pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), which is ten years after the initial clinical consensus statement that deemed the treatment as lacking sufficient evidence.
  • - Recent findings show that balloon sinuplasty is not cost-effective compared to procedures like adenoidectomy and endoscopic sinus surgery, although it offers benefits like shorter surgery times and less tissue damage.
  • - The conclusion suggests that pediatric otolaryngologists should prioritize adenoidectomy and consider endoscopic sinus surgery, as balloon sinuplasty's effectiveness remains unproven, highlighting the need for further research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Current research compared traditional FESS, balloon sinuplasty, and powered instruments for CRS efficiency.

Methods: A prospective comparison analysis of 150 CRS patients who received FESS. The surgical method divided the patients into three groups: Group A (conventional FESS, = 50), Group B (balloon sinuplasty, = 50), and Group C (powered instrumentation, = 50).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Balloon sinuplasty (BSP) is a common treatment modality used in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although it has gained popularity, minimal self-reported data on its utilization and complications have been reported. The goal of this study was to describe current practices and complications experienced during frontal sinus BSP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!