A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Sonourethrography in the evaluation of anterior urethral stricture. | LitMetric

Sonourethrography in the evaluation of anterior urethral stricture.

J West Afr Coll Surg

Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.

Published: January 2012

Background: The management of urethral stricture is a challenge to both the urologists and the patients. Thoughtful and satisfactory preoperative evaluation remains important to achieving good outcome. Retrograde urethrography and Micturating Cystourethrography (RUG/MCUG) have been the gold standard imaging technique in the evaluation of anterior urethral stricture but are not without inherent limitations and side effects. Sonourethrography (SUG) could diagnose anterior urethral stricture, measure its length, and detect presence of complications and extent of spongiofibrosis.

Aims And Objectives: To establish the sensitivity of sonourethrography in the identification of the anterior urethral stricture. To determine the accuracy of sonourethrography in measuring the length of anterior urethral stricture as well as to detecting spongiofibrosis.

Patients And Methods: This was a prospective study of 60 patients clinically diagnosed to have anterior urethral stricture. The patients included in the study underwent both SUG and RUG/MCUG. The sensitivity of SUG was then calculated. Paired t-test was used to determine its ability to measure the length of the anterior urethral stricture. The percentage of patients detected to have spongiofibrosis on SUG was also computed.

Results: The mean age of patients recruited for the study was 46 ± 18 years (Range = 9-69). The sensitivity of SUG was 94%. The lengths of anterior urethral stricture were 14.1 ± 1.9mm and 16.0 ± 2.1mm for RUG/MCUG and SUG respectively. The mean difference is 2.0mm (Confidence interval, CI = 0.872 - 2.911, p<0.05). SUG correctly identified spongiofibrosis in 31(51.7%) patients that had anterior urethral stricture.

Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that sonourethrography is a valuable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of anterior urethral stricture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170287PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

urethral stricture
36
anterior urethral
32
urethral
9
stricture
9
anterior
8
evaluation anterior
8
measure length
8
length anterior
8
sensitivity sug
8
sug
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!