Background Context: The benefits of oblique magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reformations to assess cervical neural foramina have been reported previously in clinical and cadaveric studies. But there is a paucity of literature investigating intra- and interobserver variabilities for assessing cervical foraminal stenosis using oblique MRI views.

Purpose: To determine the value of oblique MRI views compared with axial and sagittal views for assessing foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine using intra- and interobserver variabilities.

Study Design: A retrospective study.

Patient Sample: Twenty-six patients were included.

Outcome Measures: Two independent reviewers blindly identified the presence of foraminal stenosis as definite or indeterminate on the sagittal, axial, and oblique views. The assessments using the different views were compared using an independent t test. Intra- and interobserver variabilities were assessed using Kappa analysis.

Methods: We evaluated the cervical spine MRIs of patients with varying degrees of foraminal stenosis. The mean age of the patients was 60.8 years (range 50-86 years). Male to female ratio was 16:10. The oblique images were obtained by reformatting the scans perpendicular to the long axis of the right and left neural foramina, respectively.

Results: The oblique or axial views had significantly greater confidence rates for determining the presence of foraminal stenosis than the sagittal views (92.3%, 88.1% vs. 58.0%, respectively, p=.000). The oblique view had significantly better intraobserver agreement than the sagittal and axial images. Both the axial and oblique views had significantly better interobserver agreement than the sagittal images.

Conclusions: Oblique MRI views of the cervical spine significantly reduce the degree of intra- and interobserver variabilities and increase observer confidence in the assessment of foraminal stenosis. Our results suggest that routine use of oblique cervical MRI views might be useful for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foraminal stenosis
32
intra- interobserver
16
cervical foraminal
12
interobserver variabilities
12
oblique mri
12
mri views
12
cervical spine
12
oblique
10
views
9
oblique magnetic
8

Similar Publications

Background: Pain of a chronic nature remains the foremost concern in tertiary spine clinics, yet its elusive nature and quantification challenges persist. Despite extensive research and education on low back pain (LBP), the realm of diagnostic practices lacks a unified approach. Clinically, LBP exhibits a multifaceted character, encompassing conventional assessments of severity and disability, alongside nuanced attributes like pain characterization, duration, and patient expectations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate the presence and/or severity of cervicothoracic foraminal stenosis between the C7 and T3 segments could account for Horner syndrome, otherwise deemed to be idiopathic in nature.

Methods: This study was an IRB-approved, retrospective study that included 28 patients [mean ± standard deviation (age: 54.5 ± 18.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The advent of O-arm navigation optimized the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedure, allowing the operator to simultaneously perform OLIF and percutaneous posterior pedicle screw implantation without patient position change, thus improving the fluency and accuracy of the OLIF procedure (called as OLIF360). Nevertheless, a consensus regarding its suitability for patients with severe spinal stenosis remains elusive. This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of OLIF360 and its imaging changes in severe lumbar spinal stenosis cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) is a common degenerative lumbar spinal disease (DLSD) widely treated by decompression surgery, also known as laminectomy. Few cases have been observed where DLSD has progressed postoperatively, thus requiring reoperation. However, data on such cases are limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (CLBP), or low back pain lasting greater than 12 weeks, is a prevalent condition that profoundly impacts the quality of life in affected individuals. Traditional treatments - such as physical therapy, medications, injections, minimally invasive procedures, and surgery - often prove ineffective in a considerable number of cases, particularly when utilized as singular modalities. Given the complex biopsychosocial nature of CLBP, a multi-modality approach tailored to each patients' unique needs is essential.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!