Background: Lawsonia intracellularis causes porcine proliferative enteropathy and is one of the most economically important diseases in modern pig production worldwide. The Enterisol Ileitis vaccine have been shown to reduce clinical disease and to increase weight gain, however, while the natural infection with L. intracellularis can provide complete protection against re-infection, this has not been achieved by this vaccine. We therefore undertook a detailed characterization of immune responses to L. intracellularis infection in vaccinated pigs (VAC) compared to previously infected pigs (RE) in order to pinpoint immunological determinants of protection.
Results: The VAC pigs shed L. intracellularis to the same extent as non-vaccinated pigs after challenge, however less L. intracellularis in ileum and lymph nodes was seen post mortem. In the RE group, challenge did not lead to L. intracellularis shedding and no challenge bacteria were found post mortem. In both VAC and RE the acute phase haptoglobin response was diminished and L. intracellularis specific IgG responses were delayed and reduced compared to non-vaccinated pigs. On the other hand L. intracellularis specific IFN-γ responses tended to develop faster in the VAC group compared to controls.
Conclusion: Although vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs shed L. intracellularis at similar levels after challenge, a lower number of intestinal L. intracellularis was observed in the vaccinated pigs at post mortem inspection. This might be due to the observed faster CMI responses upon challenge in vaccinated pigs. Complete protection against infection without L. intracellularis shedding, however, was only seen after a previous infection resulting in IFN-γ production predominantly by CD8(+) and CD4(+) CD8(+) cells. Improved protective vaccines against L. intracellularis should therefore target stimulation of these T cell subsets.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.084 | DOI Listing |
Front Vet Sci
December 2024
Institute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hanover, Germany.
Introduction: In all sectors of the economy, including livestock production, there is an increasing focus on sustainability criteria. The carbon footprint is therefore an important target value in pig production. The aim is to minimize this value.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Cell Infect Microbiol
December 2024
State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Introduction: , , , and are the primary pathogens responsible for gastrointestinal diseases in pigs, posing a significant threat to the health and productivity of pig production systems. Pathogen detection is a crucial tool for monitoring and managing these infections.
Methods: We designed primers and probes targeting the gene of , the 23S gene of , the gene of , and the gene of .
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere
December 2024
Laboklin GmbH & Co. KG, Bad Kissingen, Germany.
Vaccines (Basel)
October 2024
Department of Animal Science, Center of Agrarian Sciences, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil.
Vaccination is a strategy in pig farming for the control of several pathogens, but commercial vaccines may have detrimental side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of commercial vaccines on the control of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), (Mhp), and (. ) and their potential side effects on welfare, behavior, acute inflammation biomarkers (C-reactive protein and haptoglobin), and the performance of piglets during the nursery phase.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Anim Sci
January 2024
Phileo by Lesaffre, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Twenty-eight mixed-parity sows (Line 241; DNA) and their offspring were used to evaluate live yeast supplementation during lactation with or without a pre/probiotic combination during the nursery period on lactation performance, lifetime growth performance, and immune response. On day 110 of gestation, sows were allotted to a lactation diet with or without a live yeast probiotic (0.10% Actisaf Sc 47 HR+; Phileo by Lesaffre, Milwaukee, WI).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!