Background: Successful ductal access is achieved in 90% of patients who undergo ERCP. Precut sphincterotomy has been advocated when routine cannulation is not possible.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of precut sphincterotomy for ductal access and the risk of adverse events including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) associated with it.
Design: Retrospective analysis of ERCP procedures performed from 2002 to 2011.
Setting: Referral center.
Patients: A total of 10,202 consecutive patients who underwent native cannulation ERCP.
Main Outcome Measurements: Efficacy for ductal access and risk of adverse events including PEP.
Results: A total of 706 patients required precut sphincterotomy, 614 of whom (86.9%) had successful biliary cannulation. PEP was diagnosed in 58 (8.2 %), perforation in 6 (0.8%), and bleeding in 49 (6.9%) patients. On multivariate analysis, unsuccessful precut sphincterotomy (odds ratio [OR] 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-4.40; P < .001) and female sex (OR 1.95; 95% CI, 1.23-3.07; P = .004) were associated with increased risk of the development of adverse events. Female sex (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.29-4.55; P = .006) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (OR 2.77; 95% CI, 1.16-6.60; P = .02) were associated with an increased risk of PEP.
Limitations: Retrospective study.
Conclusions: Precut sphincterotomy is effective in achieving ductal access when standard cannulation techniques fail. A successful precut sphincterotomy is not associated with an increased risk of adverse events.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.015 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!