The effect of epidural lidocaine administration on sedation of propofol general anesthesia: a randomized trial.

J Clin Anesth

Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou 310003, People's Republic of China. Electronic address:

Published: November 2014

Study Objective: To examine the influence of epidural and intravenous (IV) lidocaine, and height of the epidural sensory block, on the dose of propofol required for induction of general anesthesia.

Design: Randomized controlled study.

Setting: University hospital.

Patients: 66 adult, ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients, aged 25 to 65 years, undergoing elective abdominal surgery.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to 4 groups: the epidural saline control group (Group C; L2-L3 puncture, epidural and IV saline), the IV lidocaine group (Group IV; L2-L3 puncture, saline epidural, IV lidocaine 1 mg/kg), the lumbar epidural lidocaine group (Group EL; L2-L3 puncture, 1.5% lidocaine epidural, IV saline), and the thoracic epidural lidocaine group (Group ET; T9-T10 puncture, 1.5%lidocaine epidural, IV saline). Two minutes after the beginning of the infusion of IV lidocaine or saline, propofol anesthesia was initiated.

Measurements: Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and sensory block height were monitored. The induction dose of propofol, its estimated effect-site concentration (Ce), and plasma concentration were measured at various time points. Finally, we recorded the time taken for the bispectral index (BIS) to decrease to 60, the plasma concentration of lidocaine at induction, and the occurrence of adverse events. The induction time (when BIS reached 60) also was recorded.

Main Results: The induction propofol dose, Ce, and plasma concentration of propofol when BIS equaled 60 were significantly lower in Group IV, Group EL, and Group ET than Group C. The above parameters in Group ET (T9 - T10 puncture) were significantly less than in Group EL (L2 - L3 puncture). The induction doses of propofol and plasma concentration of propofol and lidocaine were significantly higher in Group IV than in Groups EL or ET.

Conclusions: Epidural and IV lidocaine reduce the dose of propofol required to induce general anesthesia. Administration of lidocaine via the epidural route reduces anesthetic requirements more so than the IV route. Propofol requirements were further reduced in patients with higher sensory epidural block.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.03.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group group
28
epidural lidocaine
20
epidural saline
16
plasma concentration
16
group
15
epidural
13
dose propofol
12
group l2-l3
12
l2-l3 puncture
12
lidocaine group
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!