A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and intraocular pressure measurements in eyes implanted with a small aperture corneal inlay. | LitMetric

Purpose: To compare the postoperative corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) of eyes implanted with a small aperture corneal inlay versus fellow eyes.

Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent small aperture corneal inlay (KAMRA; AcuFocus, Inc., Irvine, CA) implantation were retrospectively reviewed. There were two groups: the implanted and non-implanted. Main outcome measures were CH, CRF, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc), and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements performed preoperatively and at postoperative week 1 and months 1, 3, and 6.

Results: The study included 68 eyes of 34 patients. CH was higher in the implanted group when compared with the non-implanted group at postoperative week 1 (12.2 ± 3.1 vs 10.9 ± 1.7 mm Hg; P = .007) and month 1 (12.3 ± 2.5 vs 10.9 ± 1.8 mm Hg; P = .001). CRF was higher in the implanted group when compared with the non-implanted group at postoperative week 1 (11.9 ± 2.9 vs 10.7 ± 1.6 mm Hg; P = .003) and month 1 (12.5 ± 2.5 vs 10.4 ± 1.8 mm Hg; P < .001). IOPcc was higher in the implanted group when compared with the non-implanted group at only the first postoperative month (17.1 ± 3.5 vs 14.3 ± 2.9 mm Hg; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in Goldmann applanation tonometry or IOPg measurements between the two groups (P > .05). At the 3-month postoperative visit, all parameters had returned to baseline and there was no change at the 6-month visit.

Conclusions: Implantation of the KAMRA corneal inlay does not induce a permanent change in CH or CRF. A transient increase in both was seen in the early postoperative period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20141113-05DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

corneal inlay
16
small aperture
12
aperture corneal
12
postoperative week
12
higher implanted
12
implanted group
12
group compared
12
compared non-implanted
12
non-implanted group
12
group postoperative
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!