Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 143
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background/aims: We compared each vessel-sealing device to evaluate safety and efficacy for controlling surgical results in 200 patients undergoing pancreatectomy.
Methodology: Sixty-seven patients applied the hemostatic devices (VS group) consisted of LigaSure™ (LS) or the Harmonic ultrasonic dissector (USD). Results were compared with that of a historical control group (n=134).
Results: In pancreaticoduodenectomy, the prevalence of lymph node dissection was high in the VS group. Blood transfusion was significantly less frequent in the VS group than in the control group (p<0.01). The prevalence of surgical site infection and systemic complications was significantly lower in the VS group than in the control group (p<0.05). The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the VS group than in the control group (p<0.01). In distal pancreatectomy, the prevalence of cutting stapler usage for transection was low in the VS group. Postoperative weight loss and the prevalence of surgical site infections was higher in the VS group than in the control group but were more frequently observed in the USD group than in the LS group.
Conclusions: Use of energy sealing devices improves surgical results and avoids pancreatectomy-related complications. These devices are safe and effective for use in pancreatic surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!