Percutaneous implantation of a second device in patients with residual right-to-left shunt after patent foramen ovale closure.

J Interv Cardiol

Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Published: December 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to investigate the occurrence of moderate-to-large residual right-to-left shunt (rRLS) in patients following percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and assess the effectiveness and safety of additional transcatheter closure procedures.
  • Out of 322 patients, 39 (12.1%) showed significant rRLS, and a secondary closure attempt was successfully completed in 21 patients (53.8%), with 76.2% achieving complete closure afterward, while no complications occurred.
  • Long-term follow-up of approximately 41 months revealed no cerebrovascular ischemic accidents, indicating that additional interventions for rRLS can be done safely, but significant rRLS may not always imply a

Article Abstract

Introduction: The management of patients with residual right-to-left shunt (rRLS) after percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is debated. The aim of this study was to define the incidence of moderate-to-large rRLS and to report the feasibility, safety and long-term clinical outcome of transcatheter closure of rRLS.

Methods And Results: From June 2000 to March 2013, 322 subjects underwent percutaneous PFO closure. In 39 patients (12.1%) with moderate-to-large rRLS on transcranial Doppler (TCD) and/or transesophageal echocardiogram a second cardiac catheterization was performed with the aim of completing the closure. A second closure device was implanted in 21 patients (53.8%). In the remaining 18 (46.2%), a second device was not delivered for the following reasons: in 13 (72.2%) no residual passage could be crossed, in 5 (27.8%) the residual shunt was deemed to be negligible. No complications occurred. After the second procedure, complete closure was proved by TCD in 16/21 (76.2%) subjects. One patient received a third device. During follow-up (41 ± 19 months), no cerebrovascular ischemic accidents occurred.

Conclusion: A second percutaneous PFO occlusion device can be safely implanted in patients with significant rRLS. However, a moderate-to-large rRLS on TCD and/or TEE may not necessarily represent a significant risk of further paradoxical embolization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joic.12162DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moderate-to-large rrls
12
second device
8
patients residual
8
residual right-to-left
8
right-to-left shunt
8
patent foramen
8
foramen ovale
8
pfo closure
8
percutaneous pfo
8
tcd and/or
8

Similar Publications

Percutaneous implantation of a second device in patients with residual right-to-left shunt after patent foramen ovale closure.

J Interv Cardiol

December 2014

Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to investigate the occurrence of moderate-to-large residual right-to-left shunt (rRLS) in patients following percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure and assess the effectiveness and safety of additional transcatheter closure procedures.
  • Out of 322 patients, 39 (12.1%) showed significant rRLS, and a secondary closure attempt was successfully completed in 21 patients (53.8%), with 76.2% achieving complete closure afterward, while no complications occurred.
  • Long-term follow-up of approximately 41 months revealed no cerebrovascular ischemic accidents, indicating that additional interventions for rRLS can be done safely, but significant rRLS may not always imply a
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!