High- and low-dose oral delayed-release mesalamine in children with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis.

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

*MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA †Medpace, Warsaw, Poland ‡Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco §Methodist Children's Hospital, San Antonio, TX ||Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Medical University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw ¶Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Allergology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok #Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Immunology, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland **University Children's Hospital Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia ††Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX ‡‡Pediatric Gastroenterology, MUSC Pediatric Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disorders, Charleston, SC §§Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, CA ||||Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH ¶¶US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.

Published: December 2014

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of high- and low-dose oral, delayed-release mesalamine in a randomized, double-blind, active control study of children with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis.

Methods: Patients ages 5 to 17 years, with a Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) score of ≥ 10 to ≤ 55 and a truncated Mayo Score of ≥ 1 for both rectal bleeding and stool frequency, were enrolled. They received body weight-dependent doses of oral, delayed-release mesalamine for 6 weeks in a low- (27-71 mg · g(-1) · day(-1)) or high-dose group (53-118 mg · g(-1) · day(-1)). The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved remission (PUCAI score <10) or partial response (PUCAI score ≥ 10 with a decrease from baseline by ≥ 20 points). Secondary endpoints included truncated Mayo Score and global assessment of change of disease activity.

Results: The modified intent-to-treat population included 81 of 83 patients enrolled. Treatment success by PUCAI was achieved by 23 of 41 (56%) and 22 of 40 (55%) patients in the mesalamine low- and high-dose groups, respectively (P = 0.924). Truncated Mayo Score (low-dose 30 [73%] and high-dose 28 [70%] patients) and other efficacy results did not differ between the groups. The type and severity of adverse events were consistent with those reported in previous studies of adults with ulcerative colitis and did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Both low- and high-dose oral, delayed-release mesalamine doses were equally effective as short-term treatment of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis in children, without a specific benefit or risk to using either dose.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255757PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000530DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral delayed-release
12
delayed-release mesalamine
12
high- low-dose
8
low-dose oral
8
children mild-to-moderately
8
mild-to-moderately active
8
active ulcerative
8
ulcerative colitis
8
pucai score
8
score ≥
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!