AI Article Synopsis

  • This fetal MRI study focuses on identifying imaging parameters to distinguish between open neural tube defects (ONTDs) and closed neural tube defects (CNTDs) in fetuses with spina bifida.
  • The study measured the clivus-supraocciput angle (CSA) and the maximum transverse diameter of the posterior fossa (TDPF) in three groups of fetuses: those with normal CNS, ONTDs, and CNTDs.
  • Results showed that fetuses with ONTDs had a significantly smaller CSA than both normal controls and CNTDs, indicating that CSA could serve as a reliable imaging biomarker for differentiating between ONTDs and CNTDs during gestation.

Article Abstract

Objectives: In cases of "spina bifida," a detailed prenatal imaging assessment of the exact morphology of neural tube defects (NTD) is often limited. Due to the diverse clinical prognosis and prenatal treatment options, imaging parameters that support the prenatal differentiation between open and closed neural tube defects (ONTDs and CNTDs) are required. This fetal MR study aims to evaluate the clivus-supraocciput angle (CSA) and the maximum transverse diameter of the posterior fossa (TDPF) as morphometric parameters to aid in the reliable diagnosis of either ONTDs or CNTDs.

Methods: The TDPF and the CSA of 238 fetuses (20-37 GW, mean: 28.36 GW) with a normal central nervous system, 44 with ONTDS, and 13 with CNTDs (18-37 GW, mean: 24.3 GW) were retrospectively measured using T2-weighted 1.5 Tesla MR -sequences.

Results: Normal fetuses showed a significant increase in the TDPF (r = .956; p<.001) and CSA (r = .714; p<.001) with gestational age. In ONTDs the CSA was significantly smaller (p<.001) than in normal controls and CNTDs, whereas in CNTDs the CSA was not significantly smaller than in controls (p = .160). In both ONTDs and in CNTDs the TDPF was significantly different from controls (p<.001).

Conclusions: The skull base morphology in fetuses with ONTDs differs significantly from cases with CNTDs and normal controls. This is the first study to show that the CSA changes during gestation and that it is a reliable imaging biomarker to distinguish between ONTDs and CNTDs, independent of the morphology of the spinal defect.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4231033PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0112585PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neural tube
12
tube defects
12
posterior fossa
8
ontds cntds
8
mr-based morphometry
4
morphometry posterior
4
fossa fetuses
4
fetuses neural
4
defects spine
4
spine objectives
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!