Predictors of critical acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study.

Medicine (Baltimore)

Department of General Surgery (LK, ZT, WL, CW, NL, JL), Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China; and Department of Surgery (JAW, MSP), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Published: November 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent studies indicate that critical acute pancreatitis (CAP) is the most severe type of acute pancreatitis, but no prior research has focused specifically on its predictors.
  • This study evaluated the effectiveness of four parameters—APACHE II score, C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)—to predict the development of CAP shortly after hospital admission.
  • Results showed that the APACHE II score and IAP are the most accurate predictors for CAP, with the combination of IAP and CRP offering a practical approach for early prediction.

Article Abstract

Critical acute pancreatitis (CAP) has recently emerged as the most ominous severity category of acute pancreatitis (AP). As such there have been no studies specifically designed to evaluate predictors of CAP. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 4 parameters (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score, C-reactive protein [CRP], D-dimer, and intra-abdominal pressure [IAP]) for predicting CAP early after hospital admission. During the study period, data on patients with AP were prospectively collected and D-dimer, CRP, and IAP levels were measured using standard methods at admission whereas the APACHE II score was calculated within 24 hours of hospital admission. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied and the likelihood ratios were calculated to evaluate the predictive accuracy. A total of 173 consecutive patients were included in the analysis and 47 (27%) of them developed CAP. The overall hospital mortality was 11% (19 of 173). APACHE II score ≥11 and IAP ≥13 mm Hg showed significantly better overall predictive accuracy than D-dimer and CRP (area under the ROC curve-0.94 and 0.92 vs. 0.815 and 0.667, correspondingly). The positive likelihood ratio of APACHE II score is excellent (9.9) but of IAP is moderate (4.2). The latter can be improved by adding CRP (5.8). In conclusion, of the parameters studied, APACHE II score and IAP are the best available predictors of CAP within 24 hours of hospital admission. Given that APACHE II score is rather cumbersome, the combination of IAP and CRP appears to be the most practical way to predict critical course of AP early after hospital admission.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616279PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000108DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

apache score
20
hospital admission
16
acute pancreatitis
12
critical acute
8
predictors cap
8
early hospital
8
d-dimer crp
8
admission apache
8
hours hospital
8
predictive accuracy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!