A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.

Dis Colon Rectum

1Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China 2Department of General Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China 3Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong, People's Republic of China 4Department of General Surgery, the First Hospital of Huairou District, Beijing, People's Republic of China 5Department of General Surgery, the People's Hospital of Daxing District, Beijing, People's Republic of China 6Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China 7Department of General Surgery, Luhe Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Published: December 2014

Background: Recent studies have shown that extralevator abdominoperineal resection has the potential for reduced circumferential resection margin involvement, intraoperative bowl perforation, and local recurrence rates; however, it has been suggested that extended resection may be associated with increased morbidity because of the formation of a larger perineal defect.

Objective: This study was undertaken to demonstrate the feasibility and complications of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer in China.

Design: This was a prospective cohort study.

Setting: The study was conducted at 7 university hospitals throughout China.

Patients: A total of 102 patients underwent this procedure for primary locally advanced low rectal cancer between August 2008 and October 2011.

Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures comprised circumferential resection margin involvement, intraoperative perforation, postoperative complications, and local recurrence.

Results: The most common complications included sexual dysfunction (40.5%), perineal complications (23.5%), urinary retention (18.6%), and chronic perineal pain (13.7%). Chronic perineal pain was associated with coccygectomy (p < 0.001), and the pain gradually eased over time. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with biological mesh was associated with a lower rate of perineal dehiscence (p = 0.006) and overall perineal wound complications (p = 0.02) in comparison with primary closure. A positive circumferential margin was demonstrated in 6 (5.9%) patients, and intraoperative perforations occurred in 4 (3.9%) patients. All circumferential margin involvements and intraoperative perforations were located anteriorly. The local recurrence was 4.9% at a median follow-up of 44 months (range, 18-68 months).

Limitations: This was a nonrandomized, uncontrolled study.

Conclusions: Extralevator abdominoperineal resection performed in the prone position for low rectal cancer is a relatively safe approach with acceptable circumferential resection margin involvement, intraoperative perforations, and local recurrences. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with biological mesh might lower the rate of perineal wound complications (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A161).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000235DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

extralevator abdominoperineal
16
abdominoperineal resection
16
low rectal
16
rectal cancer
16
locally advanced
12
advanced low
12
circumferential resection
12
resection margin
12
margin involvement
12
involvement intraoperative
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!