Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Three-dimensional printing and computer-assisted surgery demand a high-precision three-dimensional mesh model created from computed tomography (CT) imaging data using an image-based meshing algorithm. We aimed to evaluate the three-dimensional geometric accuracy of surface meshes produced from CT images with commercially available software packages.
Methods: The CT images were acquired for 3 human dry skulls and 10 manufactured plastic skulls. Four commercially available software packages were used to produce the surface meshes in stereolithography (STL) file format. These CT-based STL surface meshes were registered and compared with three-dimensional optical-scanned reference mesh surface for evaluating the accuracy of the STL mesh produced with each software package.
Results: The surface geometries produced by the CT-image-based meshing process were all relatively accurate; differences from the three-dimensional optical-scanned data were in the voxel or subvoxel range. However, when comparisons with the three-dimensional optical-scanned surface data were performed in individual anatomic regions, we found significantly different accuracies of the CT-based STL surface meshes produced by the different software packages.
Conclusions: We found that all 4 software packages showed reasonably good meshing accuracies for clinical use. However, the range of errors inherent in the CT-image-based meshing process demands that caution should be taken in selecting and manipulating the software to avoid potential errors in specific clinical applications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001139 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!