Improving spatial localization in MEG inverse imaging by leveraging intersubject anatomical differences.

Front Neurosci

Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA ; Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.

Published: November 2014

Modern neuroimaging techniques enable non-invasive observation of ongoing neural processing, with magnetoencephalography (MEG) in particular providing direct measurement of neural activity with millisecond time resolution. However, accurately mapping measured MEG sensor readings onto the underlying source neural structures remains an active area of research. This so-called "inverse problem" is ill posed, and poses a challenge for source estimation that is often cited as a drawback limiting MEG data interpretation. However, anatomically constrained MEG localization estimates may be more accurate than commonly believed. Here we hypothesize that, by combining anatomically constrained inverse estimates across subjects, the spatial uncertainty of MEG source localization can be mitigated. Specifically, we argue that differences in subject brain geometry yield differences in point-spread functions, resulting in improved spatial localization across subjects. To test this, we use standard methods to combine subject anatomical MRI scans with coregistration information to obtain an accurate forward (physical) solution, modeling the MEG sensor data resulting from brain activity originating from different cortical locations. Using a linear minimum-norm inverse to localize this brain activity, we demonstrate that a substantial increase in the spatial accuracy of MEG source localization can result from combining data from subjects with differing brain geometry. This improvement may be enabled by an increase in the amount of available spatial information in MEG data as measurements from different subjects are combined. This approach becomes more important in the face of practical issues of coregistration errors and potential noise sources, where we observe even larger improvements in localization when combining data across subjects. Finally, we use a simple auditory N100(m) localization task to show how this effect can influence localization using a recorded neural dataset.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4202703PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00330DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

meg
9
localization
8
spatial localization
8
meg sensor
8
meg data
8
anatomically constrained
8
meg source
8
source localization
8
brain geometry
8
brain activity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!