Unlabelled: This study aims to determine the reliability of assessment criteria used for a portfolio at the Andalusian Agency for Healthcare Quality (ACSA).

Data: all competences certification processes, regardless of their discipline.

Period: 2010-2011. Three types of tests are used: 368 certificates, 17 895 reports and 22 642 clinical practice reports (N=3 010 candidates). The tests were evaluated in pairs by the ACSA team of raters using two categories: valid and invalid.

Results: The percentage agreement in assessments of certificates was 89.9%; for the reports of clinical practice, 85.1%; and for clinical practice reports, 81.7%. The inter-rater agreement coefficients (kappa) ranged from 0.468 to 0.711.

Discussion: The results of this study show that the inter-rater reliability of assessments varies from fair to good. Compared with other similar studies, the results put the reliability of the model in a comfortable position. Criteria were reviewed and progressive automation of evaluations was done.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2014.06.5998DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical practice
12
andalusian agency
8
agency healthcare
8
healthcare quality
8
practice reports
8
[inter-rater reliability
4
reliability healthcare
4
healthcare professional
4
professional skills'
4
skills' portfolio
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!