Plagiarism has become more common in both dental and medical communities. Most of the writers do not know that plagiarism is a serious problem. Plagiarism can range from simple dishonesty (minor copy paste/any discrepancy) to a more serious problem (major discrepancy/duplication of manuscript) when the authors do cut-copy-paste from the original source without giving adequate credit to the main source. When we search databases like PubMed/MedLine there is a lot of information regarding plagiarism. However, it is still a current topic of interest to all the researchers to know how to avoid plagiarism. It's time to every young researcher to know ethical guidelines while writing any scientific publications. By using one's own ideas, we can write the paper completely without looking at the original source. Specific words from the source can be added by using quotations and citing them which can help in not only supporting your work and amplifying ideas but also avoids plagiarism. It is compulsory to all the authors, reviewers and editors of all the scientific journals to know about the plagiarism and how to avoid it by following ethical guidelines and use of plagiarism detection software while scientific writing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212376 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.141957 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Analyzing the Effectiveness of AI-Generated Patient Education Materials: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Google Gemini.
Cureus
November 2024
Internal Medicine, Our Lady of Fatima University, Valenzuela, PHL.
Objective: The study aims to compare ChatGPT and Google Gemini-generated patient education guides regarding claustrophobia during MRI, mammography screening, and MR safe and unsafe items and the importance of knowing what items can be carried into an MR room.
Methods: The study utilized ChatGPT 3.5 and Google Gemini to create patient education guides concerning claustrophobia during MRI, mammography screening, and MR safe and unsafe items.
A bibliometric study of identity construction in English writing for academic purposes.
Front Psychol
December 2024
School of Foreign Languages, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Identity construction is a crucial factor in assessing and enhancing the quality of academic writing. However, identity is elusive and difficult to capture due to its abstract nature. Most existing literature discussed academic writing in a general way, overlooking specific studies on identity construction in articles, theses, and dissertations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBromocriptine Versus Levodopa and other treatments in Parkinson's Disease: an updated Meta-analysis Involving more than 4000 patients across 12 randomized clinical trials.
Acta Neurol Belg
December 2024
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Objectives: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to conduct a comparative study by systematically examining and analyzing trials that studied the impacts of levodopa and bromocriptine, either separately or together, in treating Parkinson's disease (PD).
Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted across PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using targeted keywords for studies published up to October 2024. The methodological quality of included RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool, and bias evaluation was performed using RevMan (version 5).
Strategies for integrating ChatGPT and generative AI into clinical studies.
Blood Res
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Large language models, specifically ChatGPT, are revolutionizing clinical research by improving content creation and providing specific useful features. These technologies can transform clinical research, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and results sharing. However, integrating these technologies into the academic writing workflow poses significant challenges.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA methodological research for development and psychometric properties of a new Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization (MAHLO-76) in hospital settings.
BMC Health Serv Res
December 2024
Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tabnak Ave., Daneshjou Blvd., Velenjak, P.O. Box 19835-35511, Tehran, I.R, Iran.
Background: Toward delivering appropriately safe, high quality and effective health care, healthcare organization should be health literate. This paper presents the development and psychometrics of an instrument for assessing the attributes of a health literate hospital which is called MAHLO-76 (Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization) here by authors.
Methods: The current study is methodological research which is involved two phases of tool development and psychometric evaluation.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!