Background: Uncemented Total Hip Replacement (THR) is at present an accepted treatment in patients with severe deformity of the hip caused by advanced ankylosing spondylitis.

Materials And Methods: We studied 20 patients, 2 female and 18 male, who had 29 THRs, all through a posterior approach. The patient's age at index surgery ranged from 20 to 47 years (mean 35.1). No trochanteric osteotomy was performed in any patient. A double cut of the femoral neck was performed for hips which were ankylosed in external rotation and flexion. Follow-up ranged from 18 to 46 months (mean 22.2 months).

Results: The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 34.6. At last follow-up all hips were considered excellent, with a mean HHS of 90. Radiographs revealed that the acetabular and femoral components were satisfactorily positioned with no radiographic evidence of loosening. No heterotrophic ossification was found.

Conclusions: 1) Trochanteric Osteotomy was not found necessary to expose the hip through the posterior approach. 2) Uncemented THR using HA coated stem in the treatment of severe deformity of the hip caused by advanced ankylosing spondylitis allowed good lower limb function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000197DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uncemented thr
8
thr coated
8
ankylosing spondylitis
8
severe deformity
8
deformity hip
8
hip caused
8
caused advanced
8
advanced ankylosing
8
posterior approach
8
trochanteric osteotomy
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study examines the impact of different uncemented femoral stem designs (straight vs. anatomical) on clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis patients.
  • A total of 84 patients were divided into two groups based on stem design, with clinical assessments taken at multiple follow-up points using various standardized scoring tools.
  • Results indicated no significant differences in overall clinical outcomes between the two designs; however, the anatomical stem group had lower complication rates and is suggested as a preferable option in THA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Dislocation is a common complication in total hip replacement (THR), and recent increases in dislocation rates at a specific institution were linked to reduced head coverage from a new neutral liner.
  • The study aimed to compare articulating head coverage among 25 different modular neutral polyethylene liners used in THR to identify significant differences and create a new classification system.
  • Results indicated that head coverage varied significantly between the liners (from 167.7° to 194.8°), leading to the conclusion that even neutral liners differ in coverage, prompting the proposal of a "hemispheric coverage index" for better distinction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Metallosis can occur not just in Metal-on-Metal (MoM) hip replacements, but also in metal-on-polyethylene (PE) articulations, making diagnosis challenging.
  • A case study of a 35-year-old woman showed that after experiencing recurrent dislocation four years post-surgery, intraoperative metallosis was confirmed during revision surgery after changes to her hip implant.
  • Early detection of metallosis is crucial, as subtle signs can easily be overlooked, and prompt treatment can prevent further complications like osteolysis and soft tissue damage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Uncemented acetabular components are widely used in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA). Modularity has numerous advantages including the ability to use supplementary screw fixation for the shell, and allow to switch from ceramic to polyethylene (PE) bearings and vice versa, and the use of lipped and face-changing liners.

Objective: Despite these advantages, a problem with modular PE liners is dissociation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Total hip replacement (THR)is typically cemented, cementless or hybrid depending on patient factors and surgeon preference. To date no studies have evaluated waste generated with each of these procedures in relation to implant choice, and particularly waste related to consumables. We aimed to quantify the volume; type and ability to recycle this waste and suggest potential strategies for reducing the overall waste related to consumables in THR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!