A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparative evaluation of an electrochemical bioreporter for detecting phenolic compounds. | LitMetric

Comparative evaluation of an electrochemical bioreporter for detecting phenolic compounds.

Prep Biochem Biotechnol

b Department of Molecular Biology, College of Natural Sciences , Pusan National University, Busan , Korea.

Published: October 2016

In this study, we constructed an Escherichia coli-based electrochemical bioreporter (EB) harboring pLZCapR, which encodes the CapR regulatory protein (for phenol degradation) along with β-galactosidase, and examined its ability to detect phenolic compounds as compared with previously reported optical bioreporters (OBs) controlled by CapR and detected using a luminometer (OB-lum) or spectrophotometer (OB-spec). The recombinant E. coli bioreporter cells were immobilized in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA); p-aminophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (PAPG) was used as the enzymatic substrate; and electrochemical measurements were taken. The peak current obtained on cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to measure the redox response of PAPG degradation. Our results revealed that the EB system showed a detection range of 10 nM to 10 mM phenol with a good lower detection limit (30 nM phenol). Furthermore, the detection time was dramatically lower for the EB system (15-20 min) compared to the OBs (∼ 6 hr). These responses were reliably repeatable with an acceptable standard deviation (± 2.7%; n = 6), and the system showed good stability without loss of activity over 7 hr of operation or following 2 weeks of cold storage. Together, these results show that the EB system is faster and has a lower detection limit than the existing optical techniques.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2014.979207DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electrochemical bioreporter
8
phenolic compounds
8
lower detection
8
detection limit
8
comparative evaluation
4
evaluation electrochemical
4
bioreporter detecting
4
detecting phenolic
4
compounds study
4
study constructed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!