Background: Even though vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) is recommended, an out-of-hospital setting is discussed controversially. First of all, uterine rupture and placental complications are named. Nevertheless, an increasing number of women with a prior Caesarean section decide to give birth in an out-of-hospital setting. What is the maternal and neonatal outcome in international studies in these cases?
Method: The databases of Medline, Cinahl, Embase and Cochrane Library on vaginal birth after Caesarean section in out-of-hospital settings were searched. Included are studies in German and English language without a limit on year of publication, which describe maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Results: 5 studies were found. All of them describe a high VBAC rate (73.5-98%). Only one study found uterine ruptures. Haemorrhage/placental complications were described in 2 studies (0.5 and 1.7%). None of the studies found maternal deaths. Neonatal death was described in 3 studies in a range from 0 -1.7%.
Discussion: There is a wide difference in the population of the studies. An important difference is the parity of the women and the prior mode of birth. 4 of the 5 studies do not see a reason not to try VBAC in an out-of-hospital setting. Further studies are necessary to inform the increasing number of women who decide to try VBAC in an out-of-hospital setting.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1385919 | DOI Listing |
JBI Evid Synth
January 2025
Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Objective: This scoping review will aim to determine the methodological rigor and quality of out-of-hospital clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) by collating and describing all literature that assessed these documents using a structured appraisal instrument.
Introduction: In the out-of-hospital setting, the provision of emergency health care by paramedics and first responders is guided, directed, or informed by localized, overarching CPGs. Numerous CPGs in this setting have been assessed for their methodological rigor and overall quality using an appraisal instrument.
JBI Evid Synth
January 2025
Uni SA Clinical and Health Sciences, Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Objective: The objective of this review is to develop a comprehensive collection of information about the current processes for paramedics assessing and referring suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients in the out-of-hospital environment.
Introduction: Patients with COVID-19 are frequently encountered by paramedics and ambulance service clinicians. Increased demand on ambulance services has resulted in many of these services developing alternative referral pathways to avoid unnecessary conveyance to emergency departments.
Crit Care Med
January 2025
Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Objectives: Randomized clinical trials informing clinical practice (e.g., like large, pragmatic, and late-phase trials) should ideally mostly use harmonized outcomes that are important to patients, family members, clinicians, and researchers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMidwifery
December 2024
Southern Cross University, Gold Coast Airport, Terminal Dr, Bilinga QLD 4225 Australia. Electronic address:
Introduction: In Australia, birth debriefing (BD) practices have primarily focused on clinical PTSD-FC, often neglecting the needs of mothers who describe their birth as traumatic but do not meet PTSD-FC criteria. The cessation of routine BD has overlooked a significant cohort- mothers experiencing subjective birth trauma (SBT). Their perceptions and wellbeing during the postpartum period remain poorly understood, and the lack of targeted interventions limits options for these mothers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
December 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Chiba, Japan.
Objective: To compare the neurological outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to anaphylaxis (OHCA-A) and cardiac causes (OHCA-C).
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Setting: Japanese nationwide dataset from 2012 to 2021.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!