AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aims to compare the effectiveness of tuina massage therapy and conventional pain relief (ibuprofen) for treating chronic low back pain (CLBP), which affects many people worldwide.
  • - It involves 150 CLBP patients randomly assigned to receive either tuina massage (20 minutes a session, over 4 weeks) or regular ibuprofen treatment, with outcomes measured using various pain and function assessments.
  • - This rigorously designed trial seeks to provide high-quality data on tuina therapy's effectiveness for CLBP, contributing to better clinical practices and future research in massage therapy.

Article Abstract

Background: Low back pain is a common, disabling musculoskeletal disorder in both developing and developed countries. Although often recommended, the potential efficacy of massage therapy in general, and Chinese massage (tuina) in particular, for relief of chronic low back pain (CLBP) has not been fully established due to inadequate sample sizes, low methodological quality, and subclinical dosing regimens of trials to date. Thus, the purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of tuina massage therapy versus conventional analgesics for CLBP.

Methods/design: The present study is a single center, two-arm, open-label RCT. A total of 150 eligible CLBP patients will be randomly assigned to either a tuina treatment group or a conventional drug control group in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the tuina group receive a 20 minutes, 4-step treatment protocol which includes both structural and relaxation massage, administered in 20 sessions over a period of 4 weeks. Patients in the conventional drug control group are instructed to take a specific daily dose of ibuprofen. The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline back pain and function, measured by Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, at two months. Secondary outcome measures include the visual analogue scale, Japanese orthopedic association score (JOAS), and McGill pain questionnaire.

Discussion: The design and methodological rigor of this trial will allow for collection of valuable data to evaluate the efficacy of a specific tuina protocol for treating CLBP. This trial will therefore contribute to providing a solid foundation for clinical treatment of CLBP, as well as future research in massage therapy.

Trial Registration: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov of the National Institute of Health on 22 October 2013 (http://NCT01973010).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228121PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-418DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

massage therapy
12
low pain
12
chinese massage
8
chronic low
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
conventional drug
8
drug control
8
control group
8
trial will
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!