Process outcomes in breast reconstruction and the impact of a comprehensive breast center.

Plast Reconstr Surg

Columbus, Ohio From the Department of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University.

Published: November 2014

Background: Processes outcomes for breast reconstruction (related to access, efficiency, and sustainability) have not been well described. These processes are likely to be impacted by the centralization of breast cancer care into comprehensive breast centers. The authors' study objectives were to define measures for breast reconstruction processes of care and to determine a breast center's effect on these measures.

Methods: All patients evaluated for postmastectomy breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2013 (2 years before to 2 years after opening of the authors' breast center) were reviewed. Consultation, surgical, and financial data were compared between the two periods.

Results: A total of 614 (45.0 percent) and 750 patients (55.0 percent) were treated before and after, respectively, formation of the authors' breast center. Between the two periods, the internal referral rate for postmastectomy reconstruction increased from 27.1 percent to 46.0 percent (p<0.001). The delay between surgical oncology and plastic surgery consultation decreased from 10.5 days to 3.6 days (p<0.001), as did the delay between plastic surgery consultation and surgery for both autologous (from 45.1 days to 32.6 days; p=0.003) and implant-based reconstruction (from 34.9 days to 25.5 days; p=0.004). The immediate breast reconstruction rate increased from 40.1 percent to 52.7 percent (p<0.001), including autologous reconstruction (from 13.1 percent to 20.8 percent; p<0.001).

Conclusions: In breast reconstruction, a comprehensive breast center improves processes of care. The authors describe their strategy for integration of reconstructive surgery into a breast center.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000614DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast reconstruction
16
breast center
12
breast
10
outcomes breast
8
comprehensive breast
8
authors' breast
8
reconstruction
5
process outcomes
4
reconstruction impact
4
impact comprehensive
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 15-20% of all breast carcinomas. In the last two decades, both nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstruction have been used in the surgical management. The aim of our study was to analyze the outcomes of the combined treatment of patients with TNBC treated with NSM or SSM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reinnervation of Free Nipple Grafts Associated With Improved Erection Function.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

January 2025

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Background: Most patients undergoing breast surgery with free nipple grafts lose nipple erection (NE) function. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of nerve preservation and reconstruction with targeted nipple-areola complex reinnervation (TNR) on NE following gender-affirming mastectomy with free nipple grafting.

Methods: Patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy with free nipple grafts were prospectively enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Long-term Breast Shape Analysis After Short-scar Reduction Mammaplasty: A Critical View.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

January 2025

From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Background: Over the past 2 decades, vertical scar reduction mammaplasty techniques have been gaining more acceptance. However, many surgeons are still hesitant to use it routinely because of the uncertainty of the effectiveness of vertical scar techniques in managing lower pole skin excess. We aimed to test its efficacy by using objective anthropometric measurements to evaluate long-term breast shape and lower pole stability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The placement of breast implants in a prepectoral plane has become increasingly popular in breast reconstruction, although data on how this affects radiation delivery in women with breast cancer are limited. This study aimed to assess the dosimetric differences in radiation plans for immediate breast reconstruction between prepectoral and subpectoral implants.

Methods: In this study, a retrospective review and dosimetric analysis of patients with breast cancer who underwent immediate implant-based reconstruction and postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) were performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction has become increasingly popular because it is associated with less postoperative pain and earlier recovery than traditional sub-pectoral techniques. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in pre-pectoral reconstruction is thought to provide additional support for the implant and improve cosmetic outcomes. However, it leads to additional costs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!