Background And Objective: Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of death in Germany and other industrialized countries. However, until now, little has been known about how people with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) value aspects of their medical treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate patients' preferences regarding different antiplatelet medication options following an ACS.
Method: After identification of patient-relevant treatment attributes (a literature review and qualitative interviews), a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) including five patient-relevant attributes was conducted. The DCE used a forced-choice approach in which no "opt out" was present, as no treatment is not an option after ACS. The attribute and level combinations were created using a fractional-factorial NGene design with priors. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects logit model. An additional generalized linear latent and mixed models (GLLAMM) analysis was performed to evaluate subgroup differences.
Results: ACS patients (N = 683) participated in computer-assisted personal interviews. Preference analysis showed a clear dominance of the attribute "mortality risk" (coefficient: 0.803). Ranked second was "side effect: dyspnea" (coefficient: 0.550) followed by "risk of a new myocardial infarction" (coefficient: 0.464) and "side effect: bleeding" (coefficient: 0.400). "Frequency of intake" was less important (coefficient: 0.025). Within the 3-class GLLAMM, the variables "marital status" (p = 0.008), "highest level of education" (p = 0.003), and "body-mass index" (according to World Health Organization cluster; p = 0.014) showed a significant impact on the estimated class probabilities.
Conclusion: Our study found "mortality risk" to be of the highest value for patients. Patient-centered care and decision making requires consideration of patient preferences; moreover, the information on preferences can be used to develop effective therapies after an ACS. The data generated will enable healthcare decision makers and stakeholders to understand patient preferences to promote patients' benefit.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0223-1 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Res Protoc
January 2025
Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been developed for several diseases. However, despite the potential to improve the quality of care and thereby positively impact patient-relevant outcomes, the majority of AI-based CDSS have not been adopted in standard care. Possible reasons for this include barriers in the implementation and a nonuser-oriented development approach, resulting in reduced user acceptance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Med Res Opin
January 2025
Northwestern Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Objective: To quantify treatment preferences for food allergy management options (oral immunotherapy, biologic therapy, and allergen avoidance), overall and by sociodemographic strata.
Methods: A US general population (≥13 years) discrete choice experiment (DCE) conducted comprised of 12 treatment-feature focused DCE choice sets; the Intolerance of Uncertainty─12 Scale (IUS-12); and clinical/demographic questions. Conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted overall and by age, income, urbanization, educational attainment, food and other sociodemographic factors, and presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Objectives: The Weight-Specific Adolescent Instrument for Economic Evaluation (WAItE) is a weight-specific patient reported outcome measure for use in adolescence, consisting of seven domains, each with five response levels. The objective of this study was to generate a UK value set for the WAItE, enabling the calculation of utility values.
Methods: An online Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) completed by an adult sample representative to the working population of the UK was used to estimate the preferences for the five levels of the seven domains.
Value Health
January 2025
Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut Lebanon.
Objectives To develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on preferences of the general adult population of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods The study followed the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Valuation protocol and involved conducting interviewer-administered face-to-face or online interviews in Arabic or English, using the EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) with a sample of 1005 adults representing the UAE general population. Sample recruitment involved a two-stage quota sampling strategy across the seven Emirates of the UAE, ensuring representation of nationals and expatriates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
July 2024
Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Electronic address:
Objective: This study aimed to investigate preferences for elective double eyelid surgery and explore the psychosocial underpinnings influencing ocular aesthetics and attitudes toward aesthetic surgery.
Method: This nationwide online experiment was conducted throughout four tiers of cities in China using quota sampling, which included self-administered Likert scales for general self-efficacy and modified body image and a set of discrete choice experiments (DCE) that measured the relative value and odds ratio of elective double eyelid surgery surgical options and marginal willingness to pay for procedure attributes.
Results: A total of 554 respondents were included in the final analysis (41.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!