The removal of the bereavement exclusion in the diagnosis of major depression was perhaps the most controversial change from DSM-IV to DSM-5. Critics have argued that removal of the bereavement exclusion will "medicalize" ordinary grief and encourage over-prescription of antidepressants. Supporters of the DSM-5's decision argue that there is no clinical or scientific basis for "excluding" patients from a diagnosis of major depression simply because the condition occurs shortly after the death of a loved one (bereavement). Though bereavement-related grief and major depression share some features, they are distinct and distinguishable conditions. Bereavement does not "immunize" the patient against a major depressive episode, and is in fact a common precipitant of clinical depression. Recognizing major depression in the context of recent bereavement takes careful clinical judgment, and by no means implies that antidepressant treatment is warranted. But given the serious risks of unrecognized major depression-including suicide- eliminating the bereavement exclusion from DSM-5 was, on balance, a reasonable decision.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204469 | PMC |
Aust Crit Care
December 2024
End-of-Life Advisory Panel, Australian College of Critical Care Nurses, Banora Point, NSW, Australia; Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Background: The death of a child can have a profound impact on critical care nurses, shaping their professional practice and personal lives in diverse, enduring ways. Whilst end-of-life care is recognised as a core component of critical care nursing practice and a research priority, evidence about nurses' experiences after death in neonatal and paediatric intensive care is poorly understood.
Research Question: What is the experience of the nurse after death of a patient in neonatal and/or paediatric intensive care?
Method: Following registration with Open Science Framework, an integrative review of the empirical literature was undertaken.
Sociol Health Illn
November 2024
University of Massachusetts, Counseling and Psychology, BEAHR Lab, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
When the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was published in 2013, there was a firestorm of controversy about the elimination of the bereavement exclusion. Proponents of this change and of the proposed "complicated grief" designation believed that this change would help clinicians recognise major depression in the context of recent bereavement. Other researchers and clinicians have raised concerns about medicalising grief.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCochrane Database Syst Rev
November 2024
NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute - The University of Queensland (MRI-UQ), Brisbane, Australia.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To identify and assess the effect of support interventions focused on psychological, social, and emotional outcomes for bereaved parents (including birth and non-birthing mothers, fathers, partners) and family members of parents (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDeath Stud
November 2024
Département des sciences humaines et sociales, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Saguenay, Canada.
Coping strategies are key adjustable elements mediating the relationship between risk factors and grief outcomes. It is essential to assess coping correctly. Scales based on the have tended to confuse coping strategies and symptoms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Form Res
October 2024
Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!