Willingness to pay for a new drug delivery in Parkinson patients.

J Multidiscip Healthc

The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Institute for Health Economics (IHE), Lund, Sweden.

Published: October 2014

Objective: The Swedish reimbursement system operates a system where prices are set based on the expected value to the consumer. This value can be measured using willingness to pay (WTP).

Aim: To assess Parkinson's disease (PD) patients' WTP for newly developed microtablets of levodopa in combination with a drug-delivering electronic device (M/E) compared to standard treatment with levodopa in combination with the COMT (catechol-O-methyl transferase)-inhibitor entacapone (L/e).

Method: A total of 2,000 randomly included PD patients had a postal questionnaire covering demographics, disease-specific issues, views on medication and WTP in different hypothetical scenarios. The first scenario was M/E with no change in effects or side effects; the second scenario was M/E with same effect and less side effects; and the third scenario was M/E with improved effect and less side effects. These scenarios were coupled to different costs to choose from.

Results: A total of 999 patients (50%) responded, mean age of 71 years and a mean PD duration of 9 years. Of all respondents, 50% preferred M/E before L/e in scenario one with increasing preference to scenario three. The average monthly WTP among all respondents in scenario one was SEK 230 and SEK 226 in L/e, both with an almost longitudinal doubling up to scenario three. Duration of PD-related symptoms, high education, and high medication intake implied a higher WTP in all scenarios in contrast to age, sex, and extra doses of levodopa.

Conclusion: WTP for M/E increased gradually with high medication intake and education as well as with expected increased reduction of PD symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199841PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S67929DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scenario m/e
12
side effects
12
willingness pay
8
levodopa combination
8
scenario three
8
high medication
8
medication intake
8
scenario
7
m/e
6
wtp
5

Similar Publications

Objective: In Italy, around 137,000 people live with multiple sclerosis, facing organizational complexities due to the current model's limited focus on proximity care. This project aims to define a proximity model, in accordance with recent developments in the Italian healthcare landscape, engaging over 150 healthcare stakeholders and potentially impacting approximately 14,000 patients.

Methods: An analysis was pursued to map the multiple sclerosis pathway, followed by interviews to capture the actual implementation in Italian Multiple Sclerosis Centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Therapeutic strategies for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are advancing, with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies making their way into neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. With recent advances, there was a need for multidisciplinary lung cancer healthcare providers from across Ontario to convene and review recent data from practical and implementation standpoints. The focus was on the following questions: (1) To what extent do patient (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Here, we summarize the European Hematology Association - International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis - European Association for Hemophilia and Allied Disorders - European Stroke Organization Clinical Practice Guidance document recommendations on antithrombotic therapy for cardiovascular indications among patients with hemophilia. This summary includes a discussion on primary and secondary prevention of venous and arterial thrombosis. The guidance document considers distinct and controversial challenges presented by various clinical scenarios in this aging patient population and provides thoughtful recommendations to assist the hemophilia care provider in clinical decision-making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Development of Airway Hemorrhage Simulation Scenarios With Pilot of an Airway Team Leader Assessment Tool.

Simul Healthc

August 2024

From the Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.S.); Office of Research and Development, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (J.L.E.); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (J.L.E.); Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh (A.A.); Office of Research and Development, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (J.M.M.); Emergency Medicine Faculty, Green County Emergency Physicians (N.E.-K.); VA Interprofessional Advanced Fellowship in Clinical Simulation, VA Simulation Center (M.E.E.); Department of Surgery, UPMC Horizon (J.L.-G.); Department of Otolaryngology, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (D.E.E.); Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (H.-T.D., K.A.-M.); Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (L.L.E.); and VA Interprofessional Advanced Fellowship in Clinical Simulation, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (L.L.E.), Pittsburgh, PA.

Introduction: Airway hemorrhage requires rapid treatment to prevent adverse patient outcomes. Simulation education programs are challenged to recreate learning environments with adequate fidelity for team management of airway hemorrhage.

Methods: We developed Airway Hemorrhage Simulation Scenarios consisting of low-cost partial-task simulators to mimic airway hemorrhage (nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, expanding neck hematoma) and multiple methods to assess team leader performance in emergent airway management [Airway Team Leader Assessment Tool (ATLAT), Airway Checklist Performance, and Global Performance Rating].

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel.

Am J Hum Genet

September 2024

Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The ENIGMA research consortium focuses on determining the clinical significance of variants in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes, specifically BRCA1 and BRCA2, and evolved from an external expert panel to an internal Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) to enhance alignment with FDA recognized classification processes.
  • The VCEP reviewed existing classification criteria and utilized statistical methods to assess evidence strength, testing new specifications on variants and updating documentation for better user clarity.
  • Analysis led to refined classifications for variants—resolving uncertainties and maintaining confidence in others—while revealing gaps in both ENIGMA's research and ACMG/AMP criteria, ultimately improving the classification process for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!