Introduction: Despite substantial progress in modernising neurosurgery, the specialty still tops the list of medico-legal claims. Understanding the factors associated with negligence claims is vital if we are to identify areas of underperformance and subsequently improve patient safety. Here we provide data on trends in neurosurgical negligence claims over a 10-year period in England.
Methods: We used data provided by the National Health Service Litigation Authority to analyse negligence claims related to neurosurgery from the financial years 2002/2003 to 2011/2012. Using the abstracts provided, we extracted information pertaining to the underlying pathology, injury severity, nature of misadventure and claim value.
Results: Over the 10-year period, the annual number of claims increased significantly. In total, there were 794 negligence claims (range 50-117/year); of the 613 closed cases, 405 (66.1%) were successful. The total cost related to claims during the 10 years was £65.7 million, with a mean claim per successful case of £0.16 million (total damages, defence and claimant costs of £45.1, £6.36 and £14.3 million, respectively). Claims related to emergency cases were more costly compared to those of elective cases (£209,327 vs. £112,627; P=0.002). Spinal cases represented the most frequently litigated procedures (350; 44.1% of total), inadequate surgical performance the most common misadventure (231; 29.1%) and fatality the commonest injury implicated in claims (102; 12.8%). Negligence claims related to wrong-site surgery and cauda equina syndrome were frequently successful (26/26; 100% and 14/16; 87.5% of closed cases, respectively).
Conclusion: In England, the number of neurosurgical negligence claims is increasing, the financial cost substantial, and the burden significant. Lessons to be learned from the study are of paramount importance to reduce future cases of negligence and improve patient care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2014.971709 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Ambulatory Medication Errors and Adverse Events Involved in Medicine-Related Malpractice Cases From 2011 to 2021.
J Patient Saf
November 2024
From the The Doctors Company, Chagrin Falls, Ohio.
Objectives: The aims of the study were to identify the characteristics of medication-related malpractice claims occurring in the ambulatory setting across 2 time periods.
Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was used. Ambulatory medication-related closed malpractice events from loss years of 2011-2021 were analyzed.
Practitioners of medicine have a moral as well as legal obligation to serve their patients to the best of their ability, and in recent years the medical profession throughout the world has affirmed this principle. But where there is negligence of this sacred duty, a claim arises. Most civil claims are governed by the law of limitation, which restricts the time in which a plaintiff can bring a suit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedical Malpractice Litigation Associated With Anesthesia: Result From the Lexis China Claims Database 2013 to 2022.
J Perianesth Nurs
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Deficits and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Renmin Nanlu, Chengdu, China. Electronic address:
Purpose: This study conducted an analysis of medical malpractice litigation associated with anesthesia from 2013 to 2022, aiming to evaluate incidents of anesthesia-related safety concerns among surgical patients. The use of data derived from medical malpractice claims provided valuable insights into potential risks associated with anesthesia, contributing to the mitigation of medical malpractice and the enhancement of patient safety.
Design: A retrospective study.
Professional liability in dentistry: structure and causes of judicial litigation.
J Forensic Odontostomatol
December 2024
Department of Advanced Biomedical Science-Legal Medicine Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
The great advances in diagnostic and therapeutic skills of most sectors of medicine and dentistry have led to an increasingly greater demand from patients for accuracy, attention and diligence by healthcare workers. Dentistry is one of the branches most frequently involved in claims for damages from malpractice, especially in those sectors that are particularly costly and of significant aesthetic value. Aim of the study was to compare data of malpractice claims with those of other Authors to identify similarities and/or differences in the results and to increase epidemiological knowledge in the area of dental malpractice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProfessional liability and litigation in dental medicine: an analysis of the Portuguese context.
J Forensic Odontostomatol
December 2024
Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto.
Article Synopsis
- Dentists are regulated by a Deontological Code that outlines their professional duties and obligations, which are essential in the legal relationship with patients concerning treatment agreements.
- The study aimed to analyze court decisions in Portugal relating to dentists and patient claims, focusing on various factors like patient demographics, type of liability, and outcome of the claims.
- A survey of judgments from multiple Portuguese Superior Courts was conducted, including a summary of the legal context and decisions that emerged regarding dental practice.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!