Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.

Clin Exp Optom

Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States.

Published: November 2014

Background: Rarebit perimetry (RBP) is a computer-based perimetric testing program with sensitivity and specificity for detection of visual field defects comparable to traditional automated perimetry. To make large-scale screening more efficient, we developed a parallel rarebit perimetric method to screen groups of subjects simultaneously. We then used this method to report the mean hit rate (MHR) among subjects aged 13 to 19 years.

Methods: Rarebit perimetry was installed on computers in an existing school computer laboratory. All subjects provided medical and demographic information and underwent a basic visual examination. Testing instructions were provided to groups of up to 35 subjects and rarebit perimetry was subsequently administered. Two or three test supervisors answered questions and ensured that subjects were well aligned with their test screens. Mean hit rate, reaction times, error rates and testing time were calculated, and time estimates for rarebit, frequency doubling perimetry and Humphrey 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) fast test were compared.

Results: A total of 364 rarebit perimetric tests were conducted on 182 subjects. Of these, 154 subjects met our inclusion criteria for the reference range (three testing errors or less and visual acuity 6/9 or better). The average mean hit rate was 94.3 ± 4.63 per cent. Screening of 500 subjects using this parallel rarebit perimetric method would require approximately nine hours, which is far less than an estimated 77 hours required for frequency doubling perimetry C-20 screening tests or an estimated 127 hours required for Humphrey 24-2 SITA fast tests.

Conclusion: Using our methods, rarebit perimetry can be administered in parallel to groups of subjects. The mean hit rate was comparable to that reported in previously published studies. This parallel technique may improve the efficiency of large-scale visual field screenings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12221DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rarebit perimetry
16
hit rate
16
visual field
12
rarebit perimetric
12
groups subjects
12
subjects
9
large-scale visual
8
rarebit
8
parallel rarebit
8
perimetric method
8

Similar Publications

Aim: To evaluate the different visual pathways represented by the Heidelberg Engineering Perimeter flicker defined form and RareBit (magnocellular and parvocellular respectively) in different age-groups and according to the fatigue.

Methods: Totally 64 eyes of 32 healthy subjects were included in the prospective study. Each participant underwent screening-ophthalmic examination including best-corrected visual acuity, anterior and posterior segment assessment, and visual field examination with Heidelberg Edge Perimetry (HEP)-standard automated perimeter (SAP) 24-2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rarebit is a simple and user-friendly perimetry that tests the visual field by using tiny supra-threshold dot stimuli. It appears to be especially useful for examining the visual field of children who are under 12 years of age. However, previous data showed that the number of errors was higher in children than adults.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multidimensional Functional and Structural Evaluation Reveals Neuroretinal Impairment in Early Diabetic Retinopathy.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

May 2017

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, W. K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.

Purpose: To test whether quantitative functional tests and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-defined structure can serve as effective tools to diagnose and monitor early diabetic neuroretinal disease.

Methods: Fifty-seven subjects with diabetes (23 without diabetic retinopathy [no DR], 19 with mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy [mild NPDR], 15 with moderate to severe [moderate NPDR]), and 18 controls underwent full ophthalmic examination, fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), e-ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) acuity, and the quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method. Perimetry testing included short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), standard automated perimetry (SAP), frequency doubling perimetry (FDP), and rarebit perimetry (RBP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quantitative measurement of fixation stability during RareBit perimetry and Humphrey visual field testing.

J Glaucoma

February 2015

*Department of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University †Department of Pediatric Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.

Purpose: To compare fixation stability and fixation loss between the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HVF, static fixation target) and the RareBit computer-based perimeter (RBP, kinetic fixation target) during visual field testing.

Methods: Fourteen healthy volunteer subjects wore an ASL Mobile Gaze Tracker as they completed HVF 10-2 and RareBit central field tests in a random order. Fixation stability, defined as the average distance from the fixation target to the subject's gaze location, was calculated using data from the processed video capture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

New rarebit vision test captures macular deficits hidden to acuity tests.

Acta Ophthalmol

August 2015

Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Purpose: Evaluation of a new personal-computer-based vision test aimed for rapid and accurate assessment of macular conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods: The new test depends on segmented digits defined by rarebits, that is, receptive field-size bright dots briefly presented against a dark background. Digit size was fixed at 40 × 50 min of arc.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!