In pattern classification problems, pattern variations are often modeled as a linear manifold or a low-dimensional subspace. Conventional methods use such models and define a measure of similarity or dissimilarity. However, these similarity measures are deterministic and do not take into account the distribution of linear manifolds or low-dimensional subspaces. Therefore, if the distribution is not isotopic, the distance measurements are not reliable, as well as vector-based distance measurement in the Euclidean space. We previously systematized the representations of variational patterns using the Grassmann manifold and introduce the Mahalanobis distance to the Grassmann manifold as a natural extension of Euclidean case. In this paper, we present two methods that flexibly extend the Mahalanobis distance on the extended Grassmann manifolds. These methods can be used to measure pattern (dis)similarity on the basis of the pattern structure. Experimental evaluation of the performance of the proposed methods demonstrated that they exhibit a lower error classification rate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2301178 | DOI Listing |
J Imaging
January 2025
Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Mathematics Research Centre, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 1, 33720 Tampere, Finland.
This article describes procedures and thoughts regarding the reconstruction of geometry-given data and its uncertainty. The data are considered as a continuous fuzzy point cloud, instead of a discrete point cloud. Shape fitting is commonly performed by minimizing the discrete Euclidean distance; however, we propose the novel approach of using the expected Mahalanobis distance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Department of Urology, Kyoto University School of Medicine, 54 Shougoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
This study evaluated the impact of aspirin on the biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients. A database search identified patients who underwent RARP for pT2-3N0M0 disease at any of 25 centers between 2011 and 2022, categorized into aspirin (n = 350) and control groups (n = 5857). Adjustment by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and Mahalanobis distance matching (MDM) created 350 matched pairs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Trop
January 2025
Colección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico. Electronic address:
Nearly 32 % of sand fly species recorded in Mexico are related to Leishmania transmission. A correct morphological identification of sand flies is essential to improve epidemiological and control strategies. Wing geometric morphometrics (GM) has proven to be a complementary tool for classical taxonomy, allowing us to explore variations in structure and shape between species.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComput Methods Programs Biomed
January 2025
Operations Research Group, Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg, 9220, Denmark.
Background: Around 7% of the global population has congenital hemoglobin disorders, with over 300,000 new cases of α-thalassemia annually. Diagnosis is costly and inaccurate in low-income regions, often relying on complete blood count (CBC) tests. This study employs machine learning (ML) to classify α-thalassemia traits based on gender and CBC, exploring the effects of grouping silent- and non-carriers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEntropy (Basel)
November 2024
National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases (NITFID), School of Statistics and Data Science, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
Data-driven decision-making has become crucial across various domains. Randomization and re-randomization are standard techniques employed in controlled experiments to estimate causal effects in the presence of numerous pre-treatment covariates. This paper quantifies the worst-case mean squared error of the difference-in-means estimator as a generalized discrepancy of covariates between treatment and control groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!