AI Article Synopsis

  • Only 46.1% of live poultry traders (LPTs) recognized the risks associated with contact with bird secretions, and only 22.9% felt personally at risk for H7N9 infection.
  • About 60% practiced basic hygiene like hand-washing and glove-wearing, but only 20% wore face masks, demonstrating a lack of adequate protective measures.
  • The study suggests that better communication and information on avian influenza are needed to enhance the knowledge and preventive practices of LPTs, particularly those with higher exposure risks.

Article Abstract

Background: Live poultry traders (LPTs) have greater risk to avian influenza due to occupational exposure to poultry. This study investigated knowledge, attitudes and practices of LPTs relating to influenza A (H7N9).

Methods: Using multi-stage cluster sampling, 306 LPTs were interviewed in Guangzhou by a standardized questionnaire between mid-May to June, 2013. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with preventive practices and attitudes towards various control measures implemented in live poultry markets against H7N9.

Results: Only 46.1% of the respondents recognized risks associated with contacts with bird secretions or droppings, and only 22.9% perceived personally "likely/very likely" to contract H7N9 infection. Around 60% of the respondents complied with hand-washing and wearing gloves, and only 20% reported wearing face masks. Only 16.3% of the respondents agreed on introducing central slaughtering of poultry. Being younger, involving in slaughtering poultry, having longer working hours, less access to H7N9-related information and poorer knowledge, and perceiving lower personal susceptibility to H7N9 infection were negatively associated with preventive practices. Comparing with previous studies conducted when human cases of H5N1 avian influenza infection was first identified in Guangdong, LPTs' perceived susceptibility to novel influenza viruses increased significantly but acceptance for central slaughtering of poultry remained low.

Conclusions: Information on avian influenza provided through multiple communication tools may be necessary to promote knowledge among poultry traders. Familiarity with risk may have led to the lower perceived vulnerability to avian influenza and less protective actions among the LPTs particularly for those involving more risky exposure to live poultry. Reasons for the consistently low acceptance for central slaughtering of poultry await further exploration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210513PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0554-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

live poultry
16
avian influenza
16
slaughtering poultry
16
poultry traders
12
central slaughtering
12
poultry
10
knowledge attitudes
8
attitudes practices
8
relating influenza
8
associated preventive
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!