Survey to assess the role of pharmacy technicians and nonpharmacist staff in the operation of research pharmacies.

Am J Health Syst Pharm

Rivka Siden, Pharm.D., M.S., is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Research Pharmacy, University of Michigan Health System (UMHS), Ann Arbor, and Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy (UMCP), Ann Arbor. Helen R. Tamer, Pharm. D., is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Research Pharmacy, UMHS, and Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor, UMCP. Amy J., Skyles Pharm.D., is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Research Pharmacy, UMHS, and Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor, UMCP. Christopher S. Dolan is Intern, Research Pharmacy, UMHS, and Pharm.D. student, UMCP. Denise J. Propes, CPhT, is Pharmacy Technician, Research Pharmacy, UMHS. Kimberly Redic, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Coordinator, Research Pharmacy, UMHS, and Clinical Assistant Professor, UMCP.

Published: November 2014

Purpose: Results of a survey assessing trends and innovations in the use of pharmacy technicians and other nonpharmacist staff in the research pharmacy setting are reported.

Methods: A Web-based survey was distributed to Internet communities of members of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the University Health-System Consortium involved in investigational drug research and related practice areas. The survey collected data on the characteristics of institutions with pharmacy department staff dedicated to such research activities and the participation of pharmacists, technicians, and other staff in key areas of research pharmacy operations.

Results: Survey responses from 51 institutions were included in the data analysis. Overall, the reported distribution of assigned responsibility for most evaluated research pharmacy tasks reflected traditional divisions of pharmacist and technician duties, with technicians performing tasks subject to a pharmacist check or pharmacists completing tasks alone. However, some institutions reported allowing technicians to perform a number of key tasks without direct pharmacist supervision, primarily in the areas of inventory management and sponsor monitoring and auditing; almost half of the surveyed institutions reported technician involvement in teaching activities. In general, the reported use of "tech-check-tech" arrangements in research pharmacies was very limited. Some responding institutions reported the innovative use of nonpharmacist staff (e.g., paid interns, students and residents on rotation).

Conclusion: Although the majority of research pharmacy tasks related to direct patient care are performed by or under the direct supervision of pharmacists, a variety of other essential tasks are typically assigned to pharmacy technicians and other nonpharmacist staff.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2146/ajhp140007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nonpharmacist staff
16
pharmacy technicians
12
technicians nonpharmacist
12
institutions reported
12
pharmacy
8
pharmacy tasks
8
tasks direct
8
technicians
6
staff
6
tasks
6

Similar Publications

Objective: To establish research priorities which will support the development and delivery of community pharmacy initiatives for the management of skin conditions.

Design: An iterative, multistage stakeholder consultation consisting of online survey, participant workshops and prioritisation meeting.

Setting: All data collection took place online with participants completing a survey (delivered via the JISC Online Survey platform, between July 2021 and January 2022) and participating in online workshops and meetings (hosted on Microsoft Teams between April and July 2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The non-prescription antibiotics dispensing (NPAD) from pharmacies is on the rise in low- and middle-income countries, which contributes to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study was conducted with the objective to determine the community pharmacy personnel's perspectives on NPAD and its implications for AMR.

Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in Pakistan among 336 pharmacies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ASHP Survey of Health-System Specialty Pharmacy Practice: Practice Models, Operations, and Workforce - 2022.

Am J Health Syst Pharm

December 2023

Member Relations, Section of Specialty Pharmacy Practitioners, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Purpose: The results of the 2022 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Survey of Health-System Specialty Pharmacy (HSSP) Practice: Practice Models, Operations, and Workforce are presented.

Methods: A total of 273 leaders in HSSPs were contacted by email to complete a survey hosted using Qualtrics. The survey sample was compiled from ASHP member lists, the presence of a specialty pharmacy indicated in previous ASHP surveys, and outreach to ASHP member organizational leaders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study was to explore existing practice models and opportunities surrounding community pharmacist-delivered opioid counseling and naloxone (OCN) services in the U.S., with the goal of enhancing organizational readiness and improving patient access.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Financial assessment of pharmacies and the factors affecting it is an important issue in health system and pharmaceutical industry. The present study aimed to analyze the revenue of pharmacies in Iran and the factors affecting it.

Methods: In the present study revenue data of all active pharmacies in Shiraz in 2018 ( = 298) were gathered using a checklist.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!