Impact of a spatial repellent on malaria incidence in two villages in Sumba, Indonesia.

Am J Trop Med Hyg

Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia; Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia; Public Health and Malaria Control, International SOS, Kuala Kencana, Papua Indonesia; Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia; Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Jakarta, Indonesia; The Sumba Foundation, Bali, Indonesia; Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Biological Sciences, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana; Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Published: December 2014

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted to examine the effect of spatial repellent (SR) in households at risk of malaria in Indonesia. Following presumptive radical cure for malaria in 180 adult men representing sentinels of new infection in four clusters within two villages, all households were given either metofluthrin or placebo mosquito coils. Weekly blood smear screening and human-landing mosquito catches were done throughout the 6 months intervention. Malaria infections occurred in 61 subjects living in placebo households and 31 subjects living in SR coil households, suggesting a 52% protective effect of SR. Likewise, anopheles indoor human landing rates were 32% lower in homes receiving SR coils. Differences in the malaria attack rate between SR- and placebo-treated homes was significant when not accounting for the effects of clustering. When the analysis was adjusted for intra-cluster correlation, the differences between SR- and placebo-treated homes were not statistically significant. The findings provide evidence of SR public health benefit and support a larger trial statistically powered to detect those effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257627PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.13-0735DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spatial repellent
8
subjects living
8
sr- placebo-treated
8
placebo-treated homes
8
malaria
5
impact spatial
4
repellent malaria
4
malaria incidence
4
incidence villages
4
villages sumba
4

Similar Publications

Background: Malaria incidence in the Greater Mekong Subregion has been on the decline, and most remaining malaria risk in the region is concentrated among hard-to-reach populations, especially those with exposure to forested areas. New vector control tools focused on outdoor protection in forest settings are needed for these populations.

Methods: The delivery of a 'forest pack' containing a volatile pyrethroid spatial repellent (VPSR), a topical repellent, and pyrethroid treatment of clothing was evaluated in an operational study in Cambodia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Spatial repellent products are used for prevention of insect bites, and a body of evidence exists on spatial repellent entomological efficacy. A new option for vector control, spatial repellent products are designed to release active ingredient into the air for disruption of human-vector contact thereby reducing human exposure to mosquito-borne pathogens. Clinical trials have shown spatial repellent epidemiological efficacy against Aedes-borne viruses but inconclusive outcomes against malaria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Beyond repellents: spatial emanators for the control of malaria in Africa.

Lancet

January 2025

Vector Control Product Testing Unit, Ifakara Health Institute, Kingani Area, Bagamoyo, Tanzania; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland; The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Tengeru, Arusha, Tanzania. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Progress towards malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion has left much of the residual malaria transmission concentrated among forest-exposed populations for whom traditional domicile focused malaria vector control is unlikely to be effective. New tools to protect these populations from vector biting outdoors are needed.

Methods: Alongside implementation research on the deployment of a "forest pack" consisting of a volatile pyrethroid (transfluthrin)-based spatial repellent (VPSR), a picaridin-based topical repellent and etofenprox treatment of clothing, an assessment was made of participant willingness to pay for the forest packs and variants of the packs using a discrete choice experiment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ethiopia continues to grapple with a persistent malaria burden, characterized by ongoing transmission and recurrent outbreaks. Human behavior influences both malaria exposure and the effectiveness of vector interventions, complicating malaria control efforts. Implementing tailored strategies that account for the complex interplay between human activities and vector behavior remains a challenge in both high- and low-transmission areas in Ethiopia, particularly for vulnerable highland populations and temporary labor migrants, due to lack of data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!