Photoelastic stress analysis of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by 3 dental implants.

Implant Dent

*Adjunct Professor, Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prostheses, and Dental materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil. †Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil. ‡Adjunct Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil. §Titular Professor, Piracicaba Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil. ‖Associate Professor, Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prostheses, and Dental materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil. ¶Professor, Mechanical Projects Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering School, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.

Published: December 2014

Purpose: To observe the photoelastic stress patterns generated around implants in relation to variations in the diameter and total number of implants supporting fixed complete-arch mandibular frameworks.

Materials And Methods: Three different implant configurations were analyzed (n = 3): 5 standard implants with diameters of 3.75 mm (C), 3 standard implants with diameters of 3.75 mm (3S), and 3 wide implants with diameters of 5.0 mm (3W). The samples were subjected to a vertical compressive load (1.33 kgf) applied at the end of the distal cantilever of the framework. The shear stresses were calculated around the implants, and the data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance.

Results: The implants nearest to the loading showed higher stress values regardless of the group. The C group showed lower shear stress when compared with the other groups (P = 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the 3W and 3S groups (P = 0.785).

Conclusion: A reduction in the number of implants, regardless of the implant diameter, showed higher stress concentration around the implants. Five-implant configuration showed lower stress concentration and seems to be more biomechanically predictable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000170DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

implants diameters
12
implants
10
photoelastic stress
8
number implants
8
standard implants
8
diameters 375
8
higher stress
8
stress concentration
8
stress
5
stress analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!