Cardiovascular, diabetes, and cancer strips: evidences, mechanisms, and classifications.

J Thorac Dis

1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China ; 2 Cardiovascular Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

Published: September 2014

Objectives: To report and name firstly that there are cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus (DM) and cancers (CDC) strips; and disclose their mechanisms, classifications, and clinical significances.

Study Design: Narrative and systematic review study and interpretive analysis.

Data Sources And Study Selection: to collect and present related evidences on CDC strips from evidence-based, open-access, both Chinese- and English-language literatures in recent 10 years on clinical trials from PubMed according to keywords "CVD, DM and cancers" as well as authors' extensive clinical experience with the treatment of more than fifty thousands of patients with CVD, diabetes and cancers over the past decades, and analyze their related mechanisms and categories which based on authors' previous works.

Data Extraction: data were mainly extracted from 48 articles which are listed in the reference section of this review. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed data were included, narratively and systematically reviewed.

Results: With several conceptual and technical breakthrough, authors present related evidences on CDC strips, these are, CVD and DM, DM and cancers, cancers and CVD linked, respectively; And "Bad SEED" +/- "bad soil" theory or doctrine may explain this phenomenon due to "internal environmental injure, abnormal or unbalance" in human body resulting from the role of risk factors (RFs) related multi-pathways and multi-targets, which including organ & tissue (e.g., vascular-specific), cell and gene-based mechanisms. Their classifications include main strips/type B, and Branches/type A as showed by tables and figures in this article.

Conclusions: There are CDC strips and related mechanisms and classifications. CDC strips may help us to understand, prevent, and control related common non-communicable diseases (NCDs) as well as these high risk strips.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178114PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.07.15DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cdc strips
20
mechanisms classifications
16
cvd diabetes
8
evidences cdc
8
strips
7
mechanisms
5
cdc
5
cardiovascular diabetes
4
diabetes cancer
4
cancer strips
4

Similar Publications

Drug overdose deaths among women 1999-2021 in the United States: Differences by race, ethnicity, and age.

Womens Health (Lond)

December 2024

Department of Human Development and Family Studies and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Background: The U.S. drug overdose epidemic is increasingly severe and steep increases have been seen among women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Reported amphotericin B resistance rates for Candida auris vary considerably. This may reflect clinically relevant differences in susceptibility, technical issues with testing, or adoption of a clinical breakpoint that bisects the wild-type population. We compared reference methods and two gradient diffusion strips using a shared C.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To examine the association between preventive drug lists (PDLs) and changes in medication costs among patients with diabetes insured in commercial health plans over 2 follow-up years.

Research Design And Methods: We conducted a quasiexperimental study using the Optum deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (January 2003 to December 2017). The intervention group included 5,582 patients with diabetes age 12-64 years switched by employers to PDL coverage; the control group included 5,582 matched patients whose employers offered no PDL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The emergence of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales presents unique clinical treatment challenges. Recently developed β-lactam/ β-lactamase inhibitor combination agents, while effective against other carbapenemase-producing organisms, are notably ineffective against MBL producers. While MBLs do not hydrolyze monobactams (aztreonam), many MBL-producing organisms are resistant to aztreonam through alternate mechanisms, leaving cefiderocol as the sole monotherapy treatment option recommended for MBL producers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Recent outbreaks of multidrug-resistant fungi in healthcare settings highlight the need for effective antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) to manage invasive infections.* -
  • The study compared the performance of Etest and broth microdilution-based MICRONAUT-AM-EUCAST assays by testing 121 clinical isolates, revealing significant discrepancies in fluconazole and amphotericin B resistance assessments.* -
  • Findings suggest that MCN-AM underestimates fluconazole resistance, while Etest overestimates amphotericin B resistance, indicating a need for method-specific resistance breakpoints to improve clinical outcomes.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!