Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Hypothesis: In situ evaluation of the vibration performance of a hybrid system for intracochlear fluid stimulation, constructed from a floating mass transducer (FMT) coupled to an electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) cochlea implant (CI) electrode.
Background: EAS uses both CI technology to restore severe-to-profound hearing loss at high frequencies and acoustic amplification for mild-to-moderate hearing loss in the low-to-mid frequency range. More patients with residual hearing are becoming candidates for EAS surgery because of the improved techniques for hearing preservation. Most patients with partial deafness fulfill the audiological criteria at low and mid-frequencies for the active middle-ear implant with FMT (VSB). The FMT of the VSB is a potential device for acoustical stimulation in EAS.
Methods: In seven fresh human temporal bones, stapes amplitude responses for fixation of a FMT to the long incus process (standard coupling) was compared with those for FMT fixation to a 20-mm inserted standard cochlea electrode array (31.5 mm) via the round window (Vibro-EAS). Vibration of the stapes footplate was measured by laser Doppler vibrometry.
Results: For 0.316 Vrms drive voltage, stimulation of the intracochlear fluid using a FMT-driven CI electrode (Vibro-EAS) yielded stapes amplitude responses comparable to those for acoustic stimulation with 84 dB SPL. These amplitude responses are 30 to 42 dB lower at frequencies up to 4 kHz than those for VSB standard coupling.
Conclusion: Intracochlear combined electrical and mechanical stimulation may be a viable technique for electroacoustic stimulation. A reliable technique for attachment or integration of the FMT to the cochlea electrode array has yet to be developed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000593 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!