Abstract Photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD) is a hypersensitivity reaction mounting from skin exposure to generally harmless amounts of ultraviolet and/or visible light in the presence of a photoreactive allergen. These reactions are typically delayed type (Gell and Coombs type IV) reactions and require pre-sensitization to photoallergens. Phototoxic reactions are clinically similar and often difficult to differentiate from photoallergies, but they are caused by interaction of light with photoirritants and do not require sensitization. The main investigative technique to diagnose PACD is photopatch testing, which is not commonly used; therefore, PACD may be overlooked in many patients. Currently, leading contact photosensitizers are sunscreens and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This article provides an overview on photocontact allergies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2014-0067 | DOI Listing |
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi
April 2023
Department of Dermatology, Peking University First Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Skin and Immune Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis on Dermatoses, National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Cosmetics, Beijing 100034, China.
In China, the current standard for cosmetic adverse reactions related skin disease (GB/T 17149.1-1997) was jointly issued by the Ministry of Health and the State Bureau of Technical Supervision in 1997, cosmetic-allergic adverse reactions include allergic contact dermatitis and photo-allergic contact dermatitis according to this standard. The increasing use and changes in cosmetic ingredients or formula lead to a significant increase for the incidence of adverse reactions as the cosmetics industry is developing rapidly in the last 20 years.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Gerontol
March 2024
Scientific and Innovation Center «Professional Longevity», 11/16-78 Gavanskaya str., St. Petersburg 199106, Russian Federation, e-mail:
The article presents an overview of the current problems of polypharmacy in geriatric patients when taking drugs with a risk of photosensitivity. The article contains information about emerging adverse drug reactions, as well as methods for diagnosing, correcting and preventing phototoxic and photoallergic reactions in patients of older age groups. The main aspects of dermatological support in the system of long-term care for geriatric patients when taking drugs with a risk of photosensitivity are outlined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDermatitis
May 2023
Park Nicollet Contact Dermatitis Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Active ingredients of sunscreens, or UV filters, have increased in use because public awareness of sun safety has risen. In addition to this intentional use, unintentional exposures to UV filters also occur through application of personal care products, where the filters are incorporated into the product. There are 2 main types of UV filters: organic (chemical) filters and the 2 inorganic (mineral) filters, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInability to tolerate cosmetics can result from distinct mechanisms which appear as the so-called sensitive skin corresponding to one aspect of invisible dermatosis, or which corresponds to manifestations of a contact allergic or irritation dermatitis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis paper focuses on three questions of dietetic interventions in allergic contact dermatitis: 1) in which cases it is justified to suspect that an ingested hapten causes allergic reaction, 2) how to verify the causal relationship between the hapten and current disease, and 3) in which cases dietary interventions are justified? Clinical studies, cases, and reasoning collated in this article indicate that contact allergy to food haptens should be suspected when symptoms are consistent with the clinical picture of systemic reactivation of allergic contact dermatitis or systemic photoallergy. Positive patch test result is not sufficient as confirmation of causality--the clinical relevance should be judged by means of double-blind placebo-controlled provocation with hapten in question. If such challenge appears not feasible, the relevance may be confirmed indirectly by the clearance of symptoms after introducing a low-hapten diet with remission lasting for at least 4 weeks after withdrawal of pharmacotherapy, and the recurrence of symptoms following the return to the old diet.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!