A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study. | LitMetric

Prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors in mental health hospitals: a prospective multicentre study.

BMJ Open

Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Manchester Pharmacy School, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, MAHSC, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Published: October 2014

Objective: To determine the prevalence, nature and predictors of prescribing errors (PEs) in three mental health hospitals.

Setting: Inpatient units in three National Health Service (NHS) mental health hospitals in the North West of England.

Participants: Trained clinical pharmacists prospectively recorded the number of PEs in newly written or omitted prescription items screened during their routine work on 10 data collection days. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed PE data using established methods to confirm (1) the presence of a PE, (2) the type of PE and (3) whether errors were clinically relevant and likely to cause harm.

Primary Outcome Measures: Frequency, nature and predictors of PEs.

Results: Of 4427 screened prescription items, 281 were found to have one or more PEs (error rate 6.3% (95% CI 5.6 to 7.1%)). Multivariate analysis revealed that specialty trainees (OR 1.23 (1.01 to 1.51)) and staff grade psychiatrists (OR 1.50 (1.05 to 2.13)) were more likely to make PEs when compared to foundation year (FY) one doctors, and that specialty trainees and consultant psychiatrists were twice as likely to make clinically relevant PEs (OR 2.61 (2.11 to 3.22) and 2.03 (1.66 to 2.50), respectively) compared to FY one staff. Prescription items screened during the prescription chart rewrite (OR 0.52 (0.33 to 0.82)) or at discharge (OR 0.87 (0.79 to 0.97)) were less likely to be associated with PEs than items assessed during inpatient stay, although they were more likely to be associated with clinically relevant PEs (OR 2.27 (1.72 to 2.99) and 4.23 (3.68 to 4.87), respectively). Prescription items screened at hospital admission were five times more likely (OR 5.39 (2.72 to 10.69)) to be associated with clinically relevant errors than those screened during patient stay.

Conclusions: PEs may be more common in mental health hospitals than previously reported and important targets to minimise these errors have been identified.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4185335PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006084DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mental health
16
prescription items
16
clinically relevant
16
nature predictors
12
health hospitals
12
items screened
12
prevalence nature
8
predictors prescribing
8
prescribing errors
8
pes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!