Background: In France, online reporting via a website is a new method for notifying adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The French Midi-Pyrénées Regional Pharmacovigilance Center (RPVC) set up in July, 2010 a Web-based ADR reporting tool in order to improve ADR reporting rate.

Objectives: To assess feasibility, use and performances of this new ADR reporting system. To evaluate the main characteristics of these online reports.

Methods: In a retrospective study, we evaluated characteristics (numbers, ADR reporting and file processing times, type of reporters, suspected drugs, "seriousness" and nature of ADRs) of online notifications reported to the RPVC between July 7(th), 2010 (first online notification) and December 31(th), 2011. We performed comparisons to a random sample of "conventional" notifications, i.e. spontaneously reported to the RPVC via traditional tools (post, fax, e-mail or telephone) during the same period.

Results: The total number of online reports was 312 over the 18-month period. There was a 45% increase in numbers of reports from ambulatory healthcare professionals after the implementation of the new reporting tool. Online reports were transmitted to the French Medicine Agency on average almost one month (26 days) earlier than "conventional" ones. This difference was mainly due to a faster ADR notification process via the online form (on average, the reporting period was decreased by 19 days with the new tool). In comparison to "conventional" notifications, online reports came more often from ambulatory healthcare professionals, and involved more frequently neuropsychiatric drugs and neuropsychiatric ADRs. None difference was observed for "seriousness" of ADRs.

Conclusions: It is feasible to deploy an online ADR reporting system used by health professionals in current practice. We underline the efficiency of this new online reporting tool for increasing ADRs reporting. Moreover, this is the first published study demonstrating that an online reporting tool can help to save time on the ADR reporting period and file processing, which is essential to generate early safety signals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2515/therapie/2014035DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adr reporting
24
online reporting
16
reporting tool
16
online
12
reporting
12
online reports
12
adverse drug
8
drug reactions
8
regional pharmacovigilance
8
pharmacovigilance center
8

Similar Publications

Rituximab Safety Profile: A Seven-Year Retrospective Analysis From Southern India.

Cureus

November 2024

Pharmacovigilance, Regional Training Center and ADR (Adverse Drug Reaction) Monitoring Center, Amrita Institute of Medical Science, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ernakulam, IND.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the pattern, severity, and outcomes of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with rituximab use reported to a regional pharmacovigilance center in Kerala, India.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed rituximab-associated ADRs reported from 2017 to 2023. ADRs were assessed using the WHO-UMC criteria for causality and the Modified Hartwig Siegel Scale for severity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ophthalmic corticosteroids-related adverse events: the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database pharmacovigilance study.

Front Pharmacol

December 2024

Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Background: Corticosteroids are extensively used in ophthalmology, particularly for treating various inflammatory conditions. Despite their effectiveness, prolonged or high-dose corticosteroid use is associated with significant adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as increased intraocular pressure, cataract formation, and secondary infections. However, there is currently no systematic study comparing the side effects of ophthalmic corticosteroids.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) and Erdafitinib are effective therapeutic drugs for bladder cancer patients following post-chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This study assessed adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from both drugs, comparing their safety profiles to guide clinical use.

Methods: A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted on ADR reports for EV and Erdafitinib from the World Health Organization (WHO)-VigiAccess database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current chemotherapeutic efficacy is limited by the rapid development of multidrug resistance (MDR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, 66 MDR-related hub genes in drug-resistant HCC were identified through combined analysis of differential expressed genes (DEGs), gene functional enrichment, Cox proportional regression, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction. A prognostic risk model was established through the LASSO-Cox regression analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We aimed to assess the characteristics of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) collected in a university hospital.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of ADRs spontaneously reported in the Hospital Pharmacovigilance Program database (RutiRAM) over a 13-year period was conducted. The analysis included a description of ADRs [System Organ Class (SOC)] and their seriousness, the drugs involved [level 1 of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification System], drug-drug interactions, medication errors, drugs 'under additional monitoring', positive rechallenge, and the 'pharmacovigilance interest' of ADRs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!