Advocate(®) (2.5% moxidectin+10% imidacloprid) (Bayer HealthCare, Leverkusen, Germany) is a multiparasiticidal spot-on authorized for treating canine demodicosis in many countries. This blinded, randomized three-phase clinical trial compared its efficacy employing different dosing regimens with that of ivermectin. In the blinded first phase, 58 dogs suffering from generalized demodicosis were randomly assigned to one of four groups and treated with monthly, biweekly or weekly applications of Advocate(®), or with oral ivermectin (IVR) at 500 μg/kg daily. Dogs were evaluated clinically and multiple skin scrapings undertaken every 4 weeks until parasitological cure was achieved (defined as two consecutive series of deep skin scrapings at monthly intervals negative for all life forms). Forty dogs completed the 16-week initial blinded phase, with 5 cases achieving parasitological cure. Five dogs were deemed treatment failures and subsequently treated with ivermectin. The treatment protocol was then changed for the remaining 35 dogs and this cross-over phase (Phase 2) was maintained for a further 8 weeks with an additional 9 dogs achieving parasitological cure. Thereafter, all remaining animals were treated with IVR until cured (Phase 3). Overall, 26 dogs achieved parasitological cure during the clinical investigation. Of these, 23 remained disease-free for at least 12 months while two were lost to follow up and one died of unrelated causes. A total of 32 (55.2%) dogs were withdrawn at various stages of the investigation including the 5 dogs that were judged treatment failures. Other reasons for withdrawal included: non-compliance, lost to follow-up, ivermectin toxicity or reasons unrelated to the investigation. No adverse effects were attributable to the use of Advocate(®). Parasiticidal efficacy was assessed by changes in mite counts (live adult, juvenile and egg) and skin lesion extent & severity scores. Statistical significance was assessed using ANCOVA with initial mite counts or skin scores used as the covariate to account for variations in disease severity. Planned pairwise comparisons were used to identify differences between treatment groups. The efficacy of Advocate(®) increased with its rate of application across all measures of efficacy. Although ivermectin was shown to be more effective than Advocate(®) applied once weekly, both treatment protocols produced clinically satisfactory results. It was concluded that weekly application of Advocate(®) can be recommended as effective for the treatment of canine generalized demodicosis without the potential for toxicity associated with ivermectin.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

parasitological cure
16
generalized demodicosis
12
dogs
9
canine generalized
8
25% moxidectin+10%
8
moxidectin+10% imidacloprid
8
oral ivermectin
8
blinded phase
8
phase dogs
8
skin scrapings
8

Similar Publications

Background: The use of antibiotics in the treatment of acute and persistent watery diarrhoea has long been a subject of contention. While the advantages of using antimicrobials are acknowledged, concerns remain regarding potential adverse effects and antibiotic resistance. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of antibiotics compared to placebos for the treatment of diarrhoea.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chagas disease following infection with Trypanosoma cruzi is a major public health issue, with the disease spreading beyond endemic regions and becoming more global due to the migration of infected individuals. The currently available anti-parasitic drugs, nifurtimox and benznidazole, remain insufficiently evaluated for their efficacy in adult patients. A key challenge is the lack of markers for parasitological cure, which also precludes the development of new treatments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Trichuris trichiura is a major soil-transmitted helminth infection affecting about 460 million individuals globally, with the Kato-Katz (K-K) method recommended for diagnosis by the WHO, despite its limitations.
  • A study within a clinical trial compared the effectiveness of K-K against real-time PCR in measuring treatment outcomes for T. trichiura, finding that PCR provided a better estimation of cure rates, particularly when using a combination of anthelmintics.
  • The results suggest that real-time PCR is a more reliable diagnostic tool in clinical trials for helminth infections and emphasize the need for consistent diagnostic standards across studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Dientamoeba fragilis is a protozoan frequently encountered in stool samples globally. It is debated whether Dientamoeba fragilis carries pathogenic capacities. This study prospectively analyses clinical and parasitological outcomes after treatment or a wait-and-see approach of Dientamoeba fragilis infection in a general practice adult population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Reactivation of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in HIV-positive patients is complex, needing individualized treatment and effective follow-up strategies.
  • A case of a 38-year-old HIV-positive man in Sri Lanka who experienced VL reactivation is discussed, highlighting his prolonged fever and the confirmation of VL.
  • The patient was successfully treated with intravenous liposomal amphotericin B, demonstrating the importance of following evidence-based guidelines to ensure positive treatment outcomes and the need for reliable monitoring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!