The achievement of a decentralized water management through stakeholder participation: an example from the Drôme River catchment area in France (1981-2008).

Environ Manage

CNRS-UMR 5600 "Environnement, Ville, Société", Université de Lyon, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3, Site ENS de Lyon - UMR 5600 EVS, 15 Parvis René Descartes, BP 7000, 69342, Lyon Cedex 07, France,

Published: November 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • The article investigates the implementation of public participation in integrated river basin management within the Drôme watershed in France, focusing on local media coverage from 1981 to 2008.
  • The study uses content analysis and geographic information systems to reveal the dynamics between various stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of a localized approach to water management.
  • Findings indicate a progressive but uneven implementation of participation, highlighting social aspects, strategic compromises, and the influence of political engagement on water management discussions.

Article Abstract

Different water Acts (e.g., the European Water Framework Directive) and stakeholders involved in aquatic affairs have promoted integrated river basin management over recent decades. However, few studies have provided feedback on these policies. The aim of the current article is to fill this gap by exploring how local newspapers reflect the implementation of a broad public participation within a catchment of France known for its innovation with regard to this domain. The media coverage of a water management strategy in the Drôme watershed from 1981 to 2008 was investigated using a content analysis and a geographic information system. We sought to determine what public participation and decentralized decision-making can be in practice. The results showed that this policy was integrated because of its social perspective, the high number of involved stakeholders, the willingness to handle water issues, and the local scale suitable for participation. We emphasized the prominence of the watershed scale guaranteed by the local water authority. This area was also characterized by compromise, arrangements, and power dynamics on a fine scale. We examined the most politically engaged writings regarding water management, which topics of each group emphasized, and how the groups agreed and disagreed on issues based on their values and context. The temporal pattern of participation implementation was progressive but worked by fits and starts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0378-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

water management
12
public participation
8
water
7
participation
5
achievement decentralized
4
decentralized water
4
management
4
management stakeholder
4
stakeholder participation
4
participation example
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!