Purpose: This phase I study was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of bortezomib and alvocidib in patients with B-cell malignancies (multiple myeloma, indolent lymphoma, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, and mantle cell lymphoma).
Experimental Design: Patients received bortezomib (intravenous push), followed by alvocidib (1-hour infusion), on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day treatment cycle. Patients experiencing responses or stable disease continued on treatment at the investigator's discretion. A standard 3+3 dose-escalation design was used to identify the MTD based on DLTs, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were conducted.
Results: A total of 44 patients were enrolled, with 39 patients assessed for response. The MTD was established as 1.3 mg/m(2) for bortezomib and 40 mg/m(2) for alvocidib. The most common hematologic toxicities included leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. The most common nonhematologic toxicities included diarrhea, fatigue, and sensory neuropathy. Three complete remissions (8%) and 10 partial remissions (26%) were observed for a total response rate of 33%. Pharmacokinetic findings with the current dosing regimen were consistent with the comparable literature and the hybrid dosing regimen. Pharmacodynamic study results did not correlate with clinical responses.
Conclusions: The combination of bortezomib and alvocidib is tolerable, and an MTD has been established for this schedule. The regimen appears to be efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma or indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. As the nonhybrid regimen is less cumbersome than the previous hybrid dosing schedule regimen, the current schedule is recommended for successor studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233160 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0805 | DOI Listing |
Clin Exp Med
January 2025
Department of Hematology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by clonal plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow, challenging prognosis prediction. We developed a gene-pairing prognostic risk model using m6A regulatory genes and a nested LASSO method. A cutoff of - 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBlood Res
January 2025
Hematology Laboratory, General Hospital of Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico.
Purpose: Despite advances in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapse remains the most significant challenge in improving prognosis. Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment can predict bone marrow relapse based on MRD positivity. As access to innovative therapies remains limited because of the high cost, chemotherapy is the widely utilized treatment option.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, China.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy. Previous studies have validated the prognostic significance of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with certain solid tumors. However, the relationship between the PLR and prognosis in myeloma patients has not been clearly demonstrated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cell Mol Med
January 2025
Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Turkey.
Chemotherapy is a potent tool against cancer, but drug resistance remains a major obstacle. To combat this, understanding the molecular mechanisms behind resistance in cancer cells and the protein expression changes driving these mechanisms is crucial. Targeting the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System (UPS) has proven effective in treating multiple myeloma and shows promise for solid tumours.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a very rare disease with an incidence 10times lower than that of multiple myeloma. The incidence of WM is also significantly lower than that of the other CD20+ low-grade lymphomas. The rarity of WM is the reason why registration studies of new drugs used for multiple myeloma or the more common CD20+low-grade lymphomas do not cover WM.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!