Cely and Sarmiento (2011) took issue with the cladistic analysis of relationships among species of the genus Synoeca by Andena et al. (2009a), and presented a reanalysis. They claimed that intraspecific variation in the genus is meaningful, and proper consideration yields a conclusion different from that of Andena et al. Both their critique and reanalysis are vitiated by numerous errors, as is shown in the present paper.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.3 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!