Cely and Sarmiento (2011) took issue with the cladistic analysis of relationships among species of the genus Synoeca by Andena et al. (2009a), and presented a reanalysis. They claimed that intraspecific variation in the genus is meaningful, and proper consideration yields a conclusion different from that of Andena et al. Both their critique and reanalysis are vitiated by numerous errors, as is shown in the present paper.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

genus synoeca
8
well intraspecific
4
intraspecific variation?
4
variation? taxonomic
4
taxonomic phylogenetic
4
phylogenetic characters
4
characters genus
4
synoeca saussure
4
saussure hymenoptera
4
hymenoptera vespidae
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!