A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ranitidine interference with standard amphetamine immunoassay. | LitMetric

Ranitidine interference with standard amphetamine immunoassay.

Clin Chim Acta

Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Clinical Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian and Shadyside Hospitals, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Clinical Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address:

Published: January 2015

Background: We recently encountered several cases of possible false positive results of amphetamine on the Beckman Coulter AMPH assay, but not on the Siemens EMIT II Plus assay. Our clinical chart review suggested that ranitidine interference may be responsible for the false positive results of the AMPH assays.

Methods: Blank urine specimens spiked with ranitidine concentrations ranging from 5μg/ml to 5mg/ml were analyzed on both the AMPH and EMIT II Plus assays. To examine if the false positive results were due to assay specific reagent/sample ratios, we prepared 3 different sample to reagent ratios and analyzed them for amphetamine reaction rates on both assays.

Results: Ranitidine at 160μg/ml caused a positive interference on the AMPH assay. No interference was observed by ranitidine on the EMIT II Plus assay. Specifically, the sample to reagent ratios tested neither eliminated the positive inference on the AMP assay nor introduced an interference on the EMIT II Plus assay.

Conclusions: Unlike the EMIT II Plus assay, the AMPH assay has cross-activity with ranitidine, which is independent of sample to reagent ratio.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2014.09.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

false positive
12
amph assay
12
emit assay
12
sample reagent
12
ranitidine interference
8
assay
8
reagent ratios
8
ranitidine
6
positive
5
amph
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!