Mini-invasive aortic surgery: personal experience.

Innovations (Phila)

From the *Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, and †Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatric and Anaesthesiological Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Published: June 2015

Objective: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated our experience in minilaparotomy (MINI) and compared the results with conventional open repair (OPEN).

Methods: From January 2005 to December 2012, we surgically treated 234 consecutive patients with elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, 195 men and 39 women, with a mean age of 74 years. Inclusion criteria for MINI were not ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, increased surgical risk, anatomical limits for endovascular repair, no previous surgical invasion of the abdominal cavity, and no requirement for concomitant abdominal surgical invasion. Surgical treatment was OPEN in 113 patients (48.3%) and MINI through an 8- to 14-cm incision in 121 patients (51.7%). Epidural anesthesia has been added in 26.5% and in 19.3% of the MINI and OPEN patients, respectively. Mortality, complications, aortic clamping time, operative time, need for postoperative morphine therapy, time to solid diet, and length of hospital stay were registered.

Results: The MINI has been performed in all patients selected, with 72 aortoaortic grafts and 49 aortobisiliac grafts. Early mortality was 1.6% versus 3.5% (P > 0.5); 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality were 7% versus 9%, 19% versus 22%, and 29% versus 34% (P > 0.5); complications were 12.2% versus 26.6% (P > 0.05); mean (SD) clamping time was 48 (12) versus 44 (14) minutes (P > 0.5); mean (SD) operative time was 218.72 (41.95) versus 191.44 (21.73) minutes (P > 0.025); mean (SD) estimated intraoperative blood loss was 425.64 (85.95) versus 385.30 (72.41) mL (P > 0.1); mean (SD) morphine consumption in the group given epidural and the group not given epidural was 0 (2) and 2 (2) mg intravenously (IV) versus 2 (4) (P < 0.5) and 4 (3) mg IV (P > 0.1); mean (SD) ambulation was 2.1 (0.6) versus 4.1 (2.7) (P < 0.5); mean (SD) time to solid diet was 2.1 (0.4) versus 3.5 (1.6) (P < 0.5); and mean (SD) length of hospital stay was 4.9 (1.64) versus 7.35 (1.95) days (P > 0.05), in the MINI and OPEN groups, respectively. Postoperative hernia at 3 years was 18% versus 23% in the MINI and OPEN groups (P < 0.5), respectively.

Conclusions: The MINI gives the patients a significantly shorter period of recovery with the quality and safety of the OPEN. This experience suggested extending the indication to all surgical candidates without local limitations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000098DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

versus
13
mini open
12
mini
8
abdominal aortic
8
surgical invasion
8
clamping time
8
operative time
8
time solid
8
solid diet
8
length hospital
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a progressive autoimmune inflammatory disease. According to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), the stages of RA progression include pre-RA, preclinical RA, inflammatory arthralgia, arthralgia with positive antibodies, arthralgia suspected of progressing to RA, undifferentiated arthritis and finally established RA. According to the Community Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD), the prevalence of RA in Mexico is 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective measures of oral PrEP adherence - especially point-of-care (POC) measures that enable real-time assessment, intervention, and feedback - have the potential to improve adherence. Our team previously developed and validated a novel urine-based POC metric of PrEP adherence. In this study, we sought to determine whether this assay is acceptable and feasible among women taking PrEP and PrEP providers in Kenya.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The surgical management of complicated diverticulitis varies across Europe. EAES members prioritized this topic to be addressed by a clinical practice guideline through an online questionnaire.

Objective: To develop evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for key stakeholders involved in the treatment of complicated diverticulitis; to improve operative and perioperative outcomes, patient experience and quality of life through a systematic evidence-to-decision approach by a diverse, multidisciplinary panel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

COLOR IV: a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer.

Surg Endosc

December 2024

State Key Lab of Digestive Health, Department of General Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.

Introduction: Right-sided colon cancer is a prevalent malignancy. The standard surgical treatment for this condition is laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, with ileocolic anastomosis being a crucial step in the procedure. Recently, intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis has garnered attention for its minimally invasive benefits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of individualized patient data (IPD) to inform the development of evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central in October 2023 to identify RCTs comparing Hartmann's resection (HR), primary resection and anastomosis (PRA), or laparoscopic peritoneal lavage (LPL) among patients with class Ib-IV Hinchey diverticulitis. Outcomes of interest were prioritized by an international, multidisciplinary panel including two patient partners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!