Adverse events in carotid endarterectomy from a medicolegal perspective.

Vasc Endovascular Surg

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Published: June 2015

Objectives: Characterize factors raised in carotid endarterectomy litigation.

Methods: Outcomes, alleged causes of malpractice, and other factors were evaluated.

Results: Of the 37 verdicts and settlements, defendants were not liable in 25 (67.5%) cases. Frequently reported complications included stroke (51.3%) and hypoglossal nerve injury (27.0%), with other complications including airway compromise, vocal cord injury, and death. No cases reported myocardial infarction. Cerebral monitoring was mentioned in 2 cases, while inadequate informed consent, delayed diagnosis, and requirement of additional surgery were alleged in numerous instances. Settlements and jury awards averaged US$895 833 and US$1.53 million, respectively.

Conclusions: Stroke and hypoglossal nerve injury are the most frequently litigated complications, and mean damages awarded were considerable. Knowledge of issues raised in our analysis may be included in a comprehensive consent process, potentially minimizing liability and improving patient safety.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1538574414544382DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carotid endarterectomy
8
hypoglossal nerve
8
nerve injury
8
adverse events
4
events carotid
4
endarterectomy medicolegal
4
medicolegal perspective
4
perspective objectives
4
objectives characterize
4
characterize factors
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!