A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The dynamic, six-axis stiffness matrix testing of porcine spinal specimens. | LitMetric

The dynamic, six-axis stiffness matrix testing of porcine spinal specimens.

Spine J

Centre for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Published: January 2015

Background Context: Complex testing protocols are required to fully understand the biomechanics of the spine. There remains limited data concerning the mechanical properties of spinal specimens under dynamic loading conditions in six axes.

Purpose: To provide new data on the mechanical properties of functional spinal unit (FSU) and isolated disc (ISD) spinal specimens in 6 df.

Study Design: Dynamic, six-axis stiffness matrix testing of porcine lumbar spinal specimens.

Methods: The stiffness matrix testing of lumbar porcine FSU (n=6) and ISD (n=6) specimens was completed in a custom six-axis spine simulator using triangle wave cycles at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. Specimens were first tested without an axial preload, then with an axial preload of 500 N, with equilibration times of both 30 and 60 minutes.

Results: The stiffness matrices were not symmetrical about the principal stiffness terms. The facets increased all the principal stiffness terms with the exception of axial compression-extension. Significant differences were detected in 15 stiffness terms because of the application of an axial preload in the ISD specimens, including an increase in all principal stiffness terms. There were limited differences in stiffness because of equilibration time of 30 and 60 minutes.

Conclusions: The assumption of stiffness matrix symmetry used in many previous studies is not valid. The biomechanical testing of spinal specimens should be completed in 6 df, at physiologic loading rates, and incorporate the application of an axial preload. The present study has provided new data on the mechanical properties of spinal specimens and demonstrates that the dynamic stiffness matrix method provides a means to more fully understand the natural spine and quantitatively assess spinal instrumentation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stiffness matrix
20
spinal specimens
20
axial preload
16
stiffness terms
16
matrix testing
12
mechanical properties
12
principal stiffness
12
stiffness
11
dynamic six-axis
8
six-axis stiffness
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!