AI Article Synopsis

  • Scientists discovered that the way proteins are shaped can help predict how they change over time.
  • They found that parts of proteins that are hidden inside (buried) and connect to many other parts change more slowly than those on the outside (surface).
  • Simple measurements, like how buried and packed the protein parts are, are better for predicting changes than more complex methods that look at how flexible or designed the proteins are.

Article Abstract

Several recent works have shown that protein structure can predict site-specific evolutionary sequence variation. In particular, sites that are buried and/or have many contacts with other sites in a structure have been shown to evolve more slowly, on average, than surface sites with few contacts. Here, we present a comprehensive study of the extent to which numerous structural properties can predict sequence variation. The quantities we considered include buriedness (as measured by relative solvent accessibility), packing density (as measured by contact number), structural flexibility (as measured by B factors, root-mean-square fluctuations, and variation in dihedral angles), and variability in designed structures. We obtained structural flexibility measures both from molecular dynamics simulations performed on nine non-homologous viral protein structures and from variation in homologous variants of those proteins, where they were available. We obtained measures of variability in designed structures from flexible-backbone design in the Rosetta software. We found that most of the structural properties correlate with site variation in the majority of structures, though the correlations are generally weak (correlation coefficients of 0.1-0.4). Moreover, we found that buriedness and packing density were better predictors of evolutionary variation than structural flexibility. Finally, variability in designed structures was a weaker predictor of evolutionary variability than buriedness or packing density, but it was comparable in its predictive power to the best structural flexibility measures. We conclude that simple measures of buriedness and packing density are better predictors of evolutionary variation than the more complicated predictors obtained from dynamic simulations, ensembles of homologous structures, or computational protein design.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216736PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-014-9644-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

buriedness packing
16
packing density
16
structural flexibility
16
variability designed
12
designed structures
12
sequence variation
8
structural properties
8
flexibility measures
8
density better
8
better predictors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!