Background: It has been estimated that up to one third of all emergency department (ED) visits may be "inappropriate" or non-emergent. Factors that have been speculated to be associated with non-emergent use have been noted to include low socioeconomic status, lack of access to primary care, lack of insurance, convenience of "on demand care" and the patient's individual perception of their complaint urgency. The objective of this study is to identify the reasons contributing to self-perceived non-emergent adult emergency department visits during primary care physician office hours of operation.

Methods: This study was a single-center, descriptive study with questionnaire. The questionnaire was collected from patients meeting exclusion/inclusion criteria who were triaged into an acute or fast track part of the emergency department during regular business hours on Monday through Friday, 8:00 am-5:00 pm during the months of July 2011 and August 2011. Questionnaire data were categorical and summarized using counts and percentages. Data collected included patient demographics, information about the patient's primary care provider, and information about the emergency department visit in question. All responses were compared among patients with visits considered to be non-emergent to those considered to be emergent by using individual chi-square tests.

Results: There were 262 patients available for the study. The patients were grouped according to their perception of the severity of their complaints. Roughly half of the patients placed themselves into the non-emergent category (n=129), whereas the other half of the patients categorized themselves into the emergent group (n=131). There were statistically significant differences in marital status and employment status between the two groups. It was found that 61.5% of the non-emergent patients were single, while 58.3% of the emergent patients were married. In the non-emergent group, 59.7% were unemployed, but in the emergent group 60.3% were employed (P<0.05). However, no other factors were significantly different.

Conclusions: Our study did not identify a statistically significant factor to the reasoning behind why patients choose the emergency department over a primary care physician during regular office hours. The only significant demographic indicating who was more likely to make this choice during the specified time frame was being single and employed with perceived non-emergent complaint. Patients without insurance and/or without a primary care physician were no more likely to visit the emergency department with a self-perceived non-emergent issue than patients with insurance and/or with an established primary care physician.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4129795PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2012.02.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

emergency department
20
primary care
16
department visits
12
care physician
8
patients
8
half patients
8
emergent group
8
non-emergent
7
emergency
6
visits
4

Similar Publications

Background: Palliative Care, Geriatrics and Emergency physicians are exposed to death, terminally ill patients and distress of patients and their families. As physicians bear witness to patients' suffering, they are vulnerable to the costs of caring-the emotional distress associated with providing compassionate and empathetic care to patients. If left unattended, this may culminate in burnout and compromise professional identity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of the Research to Practice column is to enhance the research critique abilities of both advanced practice registered nurses and emergency nurses, while also aiding in the translation of research findings into clinical practice. Each column focuses on a specific topic and research study. In this article, we used a scenario of chronic pain exacerbation to explore the study by Eucker et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

At this stage in the COVID-19 pandemic, most infections are "breakthrough" infections that occur in individuals with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure. To refine long-term vaccine strategies against emerging variants, we examined both innate and adaptive immunity in breakthrough infections. We performed single-cell transcriptomic, proteomic, and functional profiling of primary and breakthrough infections to compare immune responses from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals during the SARS-CoV-2 Delta wave.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Brief Intervention for Injury-Related Traumatic Stress: Results From a Feasibility Study.

J Trauma Nurs

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry (Dr Bull and Ms Rohm), Department of Surgery (Dr Urban amd Ms Rohrer), College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; and Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences (Dr McBain), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) significantly impacts post-injury quality of life; however, many injured patients struggle to access necessary psychosocial care. A brief intervention, Talk, Listen, Communicate to Recover (TLC to Recover), may facilitate access to psychosocial care in low resource trauma centers.

Objective: This study assessed staff and patient perceptions regarding the feasibility and acceptability of implementing TLC to Recover at a Level I trauma center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Family medicine was recognized as a distinct specialty in India in the early 1980s, but it is at an early stage of implementation. There are few training programs, and little is known about family physicians' training, perceptions, and current practices. This paper describes the findings from the first national survey of family medicine in India.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!